Slashdot Mirror


Patriot Act Game Pokes Fun at Government

The Miami Herald is reporting that a new game based on Monopoly is taking a crack at Patriot Act and what creator Michael Kabbash describes as the curtailed freedom that has resulted. From the article: "The object of the game is not to amass the most money or real estate, but to be the last player to retain civil liberties. 'I've had people complain to me that when they play, nobody wins. They say "We're all in Guantanamo and nobody has any civil liberties left," he said. 'I'm like "Yeah, that's the point."'"

9 of 350 comments (clear)

  1. Nothing to see here... by Evil+Closet+Monkey · · Score: 5, Funny
    Slashdot provides its own brand of humor as I attempt to load the story and receive the following error:

    Nothing to see here, move alone.

    (or something to the effect) But a quick reload showed that "The Man" did not in fact supress the story.

  2. Download location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The game can be downloaded here.

  3. I'd like to add one more thing... by AnonymousPrick · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I think it's also this perceived liberal vs. conservative, us vs. them, or the "bipartisanship" of America. As soon as a viewpoint is labeled "liberal" or "conservative", it immediately polarizes many people. But when you actually dig down into the base issue, beyond the hyperpole and mindless rhetoric, I usually see some common ground - a big swath of it.

    It's the "sound bite" media that's really doing us in. And "they", the media, are doing it because that's where the money is. There's no profit in being rational, careful, insightful, and just using common sense. Sensationalism has overtaken the media. Trying to get the issues past that, well, is impossible. Let's face it, folks want the sensationlized version. They want to feel superior to the "stupid" people who have a different opinion from theirs.

    --
    Saturday is April 1. Slashdot will be shut down. Sorry for the inconvenience.
  4. Your line of reasoning rang a bell by MarkusQ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, we're losing all our civil liberties but some guy is still free to openly criticize the government without fear of the FBI showing up on his doorstep.

    Your line of reasoning rang a bell. Where did I hear it before? Oh yeah, I remember:

    First They Came for the Jews

    First they came for the Jews
    and I did not speak out
    because I was not a Jew.
    Then they came for the Communists
    and I did not speak out
    because I was not a Communist.
    Then they came for the trade unionists
    and I did not speak out
    because I was not a trade unionist.
    Then they came for me
    and there was no one left
    to speak out for me.

    -- Pastor Martin Niemöller

    You are confusing "going away" with "gone"; just because at sunset there is still more than enough light to read by, you can not conclude that daylight is not going away, and should not draw comfort from the fact that it isn't as dark as it is somewhere else on the planet.

    --MarkusQ

  5. Re:Priceless by JamesonTheIrish · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd like to see a card with: "You break your leg falling from the top of a Abu Ghraib-style ass pyramid. Pay $200 in doctor fees."

  6. Re:Yay for wasting time... by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I rememeber hearing Mel Brooks interviewed after his film The Producers was made into a broadway play. The interviewer asked him how it was that he, a Jew, felt it was appropriate to make jokes about Nazis.

    Brooks responded that you can't fight a dictator by getting up on a soap box. Dictators are, by nature, natural spell-binders, and you'll never outdebate them. But what you can do and what works is to make them look ridiculous.

    So, in this case you paint the administration as a bunch of goose stepping blockheads who are besotted with fascism. It's not the way our system is supposed to work, but it's the way politics works.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  7. Police State, anyone? by kingsmedley · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This game sounds eerily similair to Police State, a game that was developed in the 1960's and inspired by life in the Soviet Union. The goal was a little different - you were trying to become the Soviet Premier (basically, the only person with any rights) while avoiding being denounced by others and sent to Siberia. The game board was even vaguely Monopoly-ish (in appearance, not in play).

    If you're curious, you can see the game here.

    --
    Must... think up... something... clever!
  8. Re:For the love of Pete... by CompSci101 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, for instance, the Fourth and Fifth Amendments are pretty soundly trashed by the PATRIOT Act.

    The surveillance powers granted are in direct circumvention of the Fourth Amendment, whereby a judge must be asked for a warrant for law enforcement to conduct any action against a citizen. The argument against is that informing the "Terrorists" of what is going to be searched/siezed in advance (which is what the Constitution requires) is inexpedient. The problem being that, if you're not a terrorist, you're pretty much screwed and have no recourse because any warrants issued (if they were issued at all -- see the National Wiretapping problem) were issued in secrecy and to talk about them is a crime according to other sections of the PATRIOT Act.

    The Fifth Amendment is violated because the actions law enforcement takes deprive you of due process. You're not allowed to see the "evidence" against you until you've been exported to Egypt for "questioning" and returned.

    Basically: the whole reason the Fourth and Fifth Amendments exist -- to protect citizens against overreaching Executive law enforcement powers -- is trampled by the PATRIOT Act.

    Please see: The Bill of Rights

    --
    The Sun is proof that we can't even do fire properly.
  9. I must've missed the memo... by wedg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When did Civil Rights become Civil Liberties?

    When they become Civil Priviledges, I'm running for the hills.

    --
    Jake
    Dating: while( 1 ){ call_girl(); get_rejected(); drink_40(); } return 0;