Slashdot Mirror
Windows Vista Delayed Again
Trenty writes "Ars Technica is reporting that Microsoft has delayed Windows Vista yet again. Jim Allchin told analysts that the OS would not ship in January of 2007, which is a 1-2 month delay. Oddly, even though they are citing the need for more time to tweak security, business editions will available to volume licensing customers before the close of the year."
There's an official statement here: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2006/mar0 6/03-21WindowsVistaDeliveryPR.mspx
The Wall Street Journal reported that before the stock market opened today
Microsoft shares were down as much as 3% in after-hours trading.
You'd think that Microsoft's investor relations department would try to co-ordinate two announcements that might affect the stock price. If they deliberately staggered the announcements to reduce the effect of the second one, Microsoft might be in violation of securities regulations.
In any case, investors should view Microsoft's future positive announcements with suspicion since they could simply be a precursor to a negative one.
I think what he meant to say was "OS would not ship *until* January of 2007". At least, that was the impression I got from other news reports hitting the internet this afternoon on this topic.
re: This is something I've never really udnerstand when Linux afficianado's criticize Microsoft.
Well, patch Solitaire in Windows, you have to reboot (okay, slight exaggeration), leading to downtime ranging from minutes to hours (in the case of extremely large databases)
Patch anything but the kernel(and modules) in Linux? Just keep chugging along, perhaps restarting a single process or two, and a fairly transparent experience from the user perspective.
There is a difference.
Also note: downtime due to patches, maintenance, etc., is not counted as "downtime" as defined by Microsoft - just the rest of the world. So when you read downtime/uptime comparisons from Microsoft, ignore them. They redefine the terms.
The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
provided you haven't changed anything that changes the linux image itself and only changed modules you should be able to load the new modules without rebooting.
note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
Hmmm...
a rch/045571.html
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2006-M
"So there we have it - this appears to be the first release in which they simply started dropping APIs."
"And, therefore, the first time for which we can categorically state that Wine will be more compatible with Windows applications than Windows itself."
"Not to mention that they're handing a near-fatal blow to OpenGL support, too."
etc.
If they install the business edition, they won't be able to play high-definition video in MS's proprietary DRM format.
Unlike with XP, the home version isn't just the business version with some newtorking functions taken out. It has some extra (DRM-crippled) multimedia stuff that businesses don't get.