Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Office Delayed, Too

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the not-quite-ready dept.

turnitover writes "And you thought calling it 'Office 2007' was just to make it seem all future-like -- but according to eWEEK.com's Mary Jo Foley, turns out calling it is truth in advertising: Office 2007 won't ship until 2007. What does this mean for Microsoft and its reputation as a company that can eventually ship software? What will this mean for office managers who have to plan upgrades and budgets? Will this make anyone look at OpenOffice.org?"

7 of 463 comments (clear)

  1. Wait a sec! by bogaboga · · Score: 5, Informative
    > Will this make anyone look at OpenOffice.org?

    Not until there is reported improvement in load times. For God's sake, how can one be expected to wait for 47 seconds for OpenOffice.orgs's writer to load a 1.7Mb document with 23 pages and 6 images? It's insane! I will not say what the other application takes but I'm sure every slashdotter knows what I am talking about.

    1. Re:Wait a sec! by glasen · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know, what you are talking about.

      My OO.o2 loads a 10MB document with lots of images (~20) and 10 embedded tables, in under 10 seconds.

      Have you ever tried the version 2.0.2 of OpenOffice.org?

      Seems to me that you haven't

    2. Re:Wait a sec! by The+Lerneaen+Hydra · · Score: 4, Informative

      How about disabling java in the settings, my OO.org used to take a painfully long amount of time to load, but after disbaling the time went down to something mroe acceptable (probably 1/2 to 1/3 of the time). AFAIK java is only used for advanced things that most people dont use, like macros ,live content or other stuff.

  2. Not a fan of KDE but... by mythz · · Score: 5, Informative

    KOffice is looking pretty impressive aswell lately.

  3. Re:Failures by webagogue · · Score: 5, Informative

    What are you talking about, "failures?" When was .net dropped? That MS didn't build Windows out of it is not a failure and it would be stupid to do so. People regularly, begrudgingly even, talk about nice and easy it is to develop applications in .net. MSN? Who do you think is running their Windows Live ambitions? That they aren't trying to get people to use walled-garden online services that are losing popularity isn't a failure. They are adapting to the market. And Windows on mobiles? Excuse me, but hasn't the share of WM on smartphones steadily increased year after year? Hell, there is even a Palm (rumored?) running Windows mobile. If that isn't raging success, I don't know what is. Yes, that Windows and now Office were delayed is crap and heads should roll (not so much for Office) but the things you are calling failures are everything but.

    --

    Knowledge is valuable. Ignorance is dangerous. Censorship is unacceptable. http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10
  4. Re:Will this make anyone look at OpenOffice.org? by Nexum · · Score: 4, Informative

    Um, Apple has not chosen anything of the sort.

    --

    This sig has been deprecated.
  5. Re:At our office by Hangtime · · Score: 5, Informative

    If your like me and a power user of Excel some of these should catch your eye and almost force an upgrade especially the new row and column limits.

    The total number of available columns in Excel
    Old Limit: 256 (2^8)
    New Limit: 16k (2^14)

    The total number of available rows in Excel
    Old Limit: 64k (2^16)
    New Limit: 1M (2^20)

    Number of levels of sorting on a range or table
    Old Limit: 3
    New Limit: 64

    The maximum length of formulas (in characters)
    Old Limit: 1k characters
    New Limit: 8k characters

    The number of levels of nesting that Excel allows in formulas
    Old Limit: 7
    New Limit: 64

    Number of rows allowed in a Pivot Table
    Old Limit: 64k
    New Limit: 1M

    Number of columns allowed in a Pivot Table
    Old Limit: 255
    New Limit: 16k