Cray Introduces Adaptive Supercomputing
David Greene writes "HPCWire has a story about Cray's newly-introduced vision of Adaptive Supercomputing. The new system will combine multiple processor architectures to broaden applicability of HPC systems and reduce the complexity of HPC application development. Cray CTO Steve Scott says, 'The Cray motto is: adapt the system to the application - not the application to the system.'"
Cray CTO Steve Scott says, 'The Cray motto is: adapt the system to the application - not the application to the system.'
That's a good motto, but how often do you bend the will of your application, needs or business to the limitations of the application? I've been sitting on something for a couple weeks after telling someone "You really should have accepted the information the other way, because this new way you want it is highly problematic (meaning: rather than rip it off with a simple SQL query, I'll have to do an app)"
IMHO adapting to the needs of the user == customisationg, which also == money. Maybe it's not a bad idea at that! :-)
In certain cases, at run-time, the system will determine the most appropriate processor for running a piece of code, and direct the execution accordingly.
This assumes, of course, that you have X number of processors to chose from. If you can't do it, the answer is still 'throw more money at it, buy more hardware.'
my head is still spinning from all the new buzzwords overheard at SD West 2006.
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar