The Beatles, Apple, and iTunes
novus ordo writes "Apple is being sued in London by Apple Corps, owned by the former Beatles and their heirs. This is a third battle over the name 'Apple' in Britain. Apple Corps has previously been awarded $26M by Apple Computer for the use of the name."
"Apple Corps has previously been awarded $26M by Apple Computer for the use of the name."
Wrong. They weren't awarded anything. They settled. As far as I know, this didn't even get to court.
Generally though, this is nonsense. The Apple Group are just trying to get money out of Apple Computers.
Yes. Apple Group are trying to get money out of Apple Computer for breaking the agreement that they came to in 1991.
The fact that this wasn't resolved years ago shows both the incompetence of the Apple Computer Lawyers
(smacks forehead).... no, no it doesn't.
Push Button, Receive Bacon
List of goods and/or services
Class 09: Sound recording and sound reproducing apparatus and instruments; radio transmitting and radio receiving apparatus and instruments; video and sound records in the form of discs, films, tapes or filaments; and parts included in Class 9 for all the aforesaid goods.CANCELLED IN RESPECT OF:All goods except sound recording, sound reproducing, radio transmitting and radio receiving apparatus and instruments and parts for all the aforesaid goods, none being computers or goods of the same description as computers, but not cancelled in respect of video and sound records in the form of discs, films, tapes or filaments. I.e. Apple Records' trademark only covers physical recordings.
I'm not a lawyer, but I sure think that Apple Corps has a great case. There is both precedent where Apple Computer lost and paid damages and there is retention of trademark which is, as stated above, still in active usage.