Slashdot Mirror


DRM and the Myth of the Analog Hole

Art Grimm writes "Movie studios want to punish legitimate customers for legally purchasing content, while the real pirates go right on stealing. ZDNet's George Ou writes: "There seems to be a persistent myth floating around the board rooms of the movie companies and Congress that analog content is the boogie man of music and video piracy. In fact, they're so paranoid about it that they're considering a mechanism called ICT (Image Constraint Token) that punishes law-abiding customers for content that they legally purchased. But ironically, the real content pirates who make millions of bootleg movies have no intention of ever taking advantage of the so called "analog hole" because that is the slowest and lowest quality method of stealing content.""

4 of 314 comments (clear)

  1. Bootlegs often aren't bit-by-bit by gbulmash · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't know what research the author of TFA has done on bootleg DVDs, but I've seen a few a friend brought back from Thailand.

    The ones that hit the street before even the US release of the DVD are either from a video camera in the theater or from copying a screener. Often you can see the screener warnings while watching the movie.

    Additionally, to serve an Asian market, many have had additional Asian subtitles added and then were recompressed, causing quality to diminish.

    Bit-by-bit copies are fine and good in theory, but that's for discs already in release, serving the languages for which the discs already have subtitles or alternative soundtracks. But by then, there's already been a brisk trade in bootlegs those films.

    Yes, the analog hole is inefficient and not the best way to copy something. It's merely an example of how a determined pirate can still get around most DRM. It's like protecting graphics on the web. You can disable right clicking, do odd things with MIME types, etc. But in the end, all someone needs to do is capture the screen and crop out the image.

    Long and short, DRM and copy protection stops casual copiers. But dedicated copiers, if left with no other alternative, still have the analog hole as a last resort. And once one dedicated copier puts something on the file sharing nets...

    1. Re:Bootlegs often aren't bit-by-bit by Mprx · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're doing it wrong. It's 100% possible to get bit identical copies of audio CDs. Use correctly configured good CD ripping software such as Exact Audio Copy and a high quality drive, and there is no generational loss. I've tested this myself, and the CDRs rip to bit identical wavs to the original CDs. (The error correction isn't guaranteed bit identical, but it gets regenerated each generation, so it doesn't matter).

  2. Re:Analog over digital any day for me... by HTL2001 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had a phone that was capable of analog on verizon... it sucked the battery dry ~5x faster than digital, even while not making calls....

    --
    By reading this, you have given me brief control of your mind.
  3. But it's important to keep in mind... by O'Laochdha · · Score: 4, Informative

    That this "penalty" is only a decrease in resolution. Unless they have a gigantic TV, in which case my guess would be that they could afford the better technology, the average Joe won't notice unless he's specifically looking for it.