On Apple vs Apple
Since nothing else really interesting is happening, here is a CNN story about Apple vs Apple where you can read about the latest developments in the latest round of the never ending court battles as two bazillion dollar companies fight over who gets to use the word 'Apple' to sell music.
The Beatles have historically been 'behind the times' technologically, what we might call 'late adopters'.
By "The Beatles", you presumably mean the talentless gits still cashing in on John Lennons talent? The Beatles as an entity ceased to exist in 1970, but were quite technologically advanced for their day (in terms of production techniques etc).
Oh no... it's the future.
There are the usual appologists, "Apple (Computer) can do no wrong!"
Where, exactly? Perusing the comments, I didn't see any. I'd say you might be nostalgic for the days when inflamatory anti-Apple statements like Taco's "No wireless, less space than a Nomad, lame" earned an automatic +5 Insightful, but your UID is pretty high.