Slashdot Mirror


Security Fears Prod Firms to Limit Staff Web Use

Carl Bialik from WSJ writes "Companies are limiting employees' use of free Internet services, such as Skype and video downloading, to protect themselves from viruses, communications traffic jams and regulatory missteps, the Wall Street Journal reports. ABN Amro's global head of strategy and engineering tells the WSJ, 'I'm not allowing Skype because I don't know what it does.' Some colleges and departments at Cambridge University also ban Skype. The limits affect executives as well as the rank-and-file, the WSJ finds: ' "I used to think nothing of checking my Yahoo mail several times a day," says Global Crossing Chief Marketing Officer Anthony Christie. Now that he can't, his long workday makes it hard to avoid using his work email account for personal messages, he says.'"

3 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. ssh tunneling by Rinisari · · Score: 4, Informative

    As long as it's not against company policy, you could try using SSH tunneling to hit a proxy at home. It might be a lot slower, but you can go anywhere. I've been using one written in Python for six months and haven't had a hitch.

  2. The Internet is not only for pr0n by lushman · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a consultant based overseas, using my client's corporate internet for Skype actually SAVES them a fortune. They would normally pay for the POTS international phone calls we make (VERY $$$$$), but the fact that they allow Skype means that we make all of our calls Skype-Skype without it costing them (or us) anything in call costs. Bandwidth charges are negligible in comparison.

    If firms continue to be ignorant about new or alternative technologies then they will continue to be left behind. These savings can be significant over the long term, financially as well as productivity wise. Companies in the future will be split into two categories - those that embrace new technology and those that struggle under malinformed regimes run by beaurocrats who prefer the trusted path, the path of least resistance, over the newer, technologically superior one. I've seen this too many times than I'd care to remember.

  3. Re:This type of admin is the bane of users by giantsfan89 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The problem here is selective enforcement. Okay, so the admins allow you to run your unapproved application. What if Suzy the administrative assistant wants to run her fav screensaver app? And Jim wants to run Weatherbug so he knows when there's bad weather on his kids in the Midwest? The problem is that machines are locked down to prevent users from shooting themselves in the foot, because if you give them the loaded gun of admin access, they will. Then they start shooting other peoples' feet.

    Find out how to get the software approved and do it. Go through the proper channels.

    99.9% of corporate users should not have administrative access to their computers. There is no need to.

    --
    Don't ping my cheese with your bandwidth!