Slashdot Mirror


NPR & The Modern Media Distribution

Isao writes "The U.S. National Public Radio (NPR) network is feeling the pinch between giving their content away for free on the radio and on the internet as podcasts. The dilemma is that some of their audience is turning from the radio to podcasts, not for flexibility, but to either access locally unavailable content or avoid fundraising marathons (NPR is partially funded by listener donations). This has begun to skew their financial model. What's different about NPR's response is that they're not pretending that their old business model will work forever."

1 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. Taxation? What are you talking about? by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative
    I don't care how valuable NPR is or thinks it is -- as long as they are funded through coercion (taxation), then I will treat them as an organization which is funded through coercion. That is, I will never so much as consider helping them, no matter how much they need it.
    As you can see from their website not a goddamn red cent comes from your taxes. Look through their income sheets and point out where your money is going in. They're a non-profit organization delivering free information to anyone with a radio.

    Anyone who wants to know what is going on in the world need only tune to their channel. In my opinion, they're taking a stab at eliminating ignorance in our nation by bathing everyone in nearly free (and unbiased) information and I'd consider that more valuable than cable TV.
    --
    My work here is dung.