Gmail vs Pine
Snarfed has an interesting review on Gmail vs Pine. From the article: "I've used Pine as my email client for, well, pretty much forever. I use it because it's fast, powerful, stable, and very keyboardable. (I hate the mouse.) However, since I work at Google, I'm constantly bombarded with people who ask me why I don't use Gmail. After hearing the nth person brag about how much it increased their productivity, I finally broke down and tried it. I didn't expect much, since I've never liked web-based email clients. However, I made myself use it as my only email client, for a month, to give it a fair shot."
...GoogleFight!
GMail Email Client: 5,100,000 results
Pine Email Client: 2,080,000 results
Sorry dude. The unwashed masses have spoken. Time to upgrade!
Javascript + Nintendo DSi = DSiCade
What is this? Some guy tries something that everyone has been using for years now? Hey - guess what I found out the other day - cars! I used to walk everywhere..... Hey! I found out about phones last week! They're great - I don't have to travel 50 miles to speak to ....
Get your own free personal location tracker
Back in the dark ages before webmail, only newbies and English majors used pine. Everyone else either used mail or elm. I personally used elm, and still prefer it if I ever need to use a command-line mail utility, which isn't all that often these days.
The things I hated about Pine were that it unnecessarily reversed colors on the screen to look more "graphical," and its default editor was that horror known as Pico. I much preferred elm and vi.
Heh ... you're using Pine? Real nerds just telnet to port 110.
</sarcasm>
If you work for Microsoft and you use Pine to access your Hotmail account you've already meet SteveB for a nice one-on-one :-)
DOH! /me cackles quietly to self.
..
Damn, I got n00b all over myself there
Robert Anton Wilson
And a computer with a USB port but no Internet access is useful for e-mail how?