Slashdot Mirror


Redhat and Intel Team Up for Linux Business

Red Hat and Intel announced today at LinuxWorld Boston that they would be entering a partnership to help customers "plan for, accelerate and optimize their deployments of Linux solutions." From the article: "'We're responding to what customers have told us they really need to support their advanced deployments of Linux and open source,' said Tim Yeaton, executive vice president of Enterprise Solutions at Red Hat. 'The programs Intel and Red Hat have selected are aimed at equipping customers with in-depth domain knowledge and providing hard core data to make complex architectural decisions.'"

4 of 66 comments (clear)

  1. snipe by sloths · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    snipe

    --
    really 867993
    Karma schkarma
  2. Redhat kills the Fedora Foundation. by DAldredge · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    To my fellow Fedora community members:

    As many of you are aware, FUDCon Boston is this Friday. One of the most
    important topics that we will be discussing there is the future of the
    Fedora Project, specifically with regard to the Fedora Foundation.

    I'd like to ask you all to read the document that follows this note. It
    reviews Red Hat's intentions in initially announcing the Fedora
    Foundation, and outlines the problems that have led us to the decision to
    move in a different direction. It also discusses the plan that we are
    implementing instead, and the steps that we are taking to ensure that the
    Fedora Project continues to thrive and grow.

    It is as complete, honest, and transparent as we can make it. If you feel
    that there are places in which it lacks those qualities, call us on it,
    and we will respond.

    This document represents the work of many people both inside of Red Hat
    and within the Fedora community. It is a long read, but a very worthwhile
    one.

    So take a look, read, digest, and share your thoughts. I look forward to
    discussing this in great detail on email, and also with as many of you as
    possible in person at LinuxWorld and at FUDCon over the next few days.
    Many of Red Hat's most active Fedora folks will be at those two shows, so
    please come and talk with us.

    Sincerely,
    Max Spevack

    Last June, Red Hat announced its intention to launch the Fedora
    Foundation. We've had a lot of smart people working hard to make this
    Foundation happen, but in the end, it just didn't help to accomplish our
    goals for Fedora. Instead, we are restructuring Fedora Project, with
    dramatically increased leadership from within the Fedora community.

    The next obvious question "Why no Foundation?" deserves a detailed
    explanation.

    WHY NO FOUNDATION?

    When we announced the Foundation, it was with a very specific purpose, and
    in a very specific context. The announcement was made by Mark Webbink,
    who has been the intellectual property guru at Red Hat for a long time
    now. His stated goal for the Foundation: to act as a repository for
    patents that would protect the interests of the open source community.

    Once we announced the intention to form a Foundation, people inside and
    outside of Red Hat were interested in working beyond the stated purpose --
    an intellectual property repository and instead saw this new Foundation
    as a potential tool to solve all sorts of Fedora-related issues. Every
    Fedora issue became a nail for the Foundation hammer, and the scope of the
    Foundation quickly became too large for efficient progress.

    A team moved forward to create the Foundation itself. We created the
    legal entity, came up with some very basic and flexible bylaws, and
    appointed a board to run it temporarily. This all happened pretty
    quickly, because this was the easy part. We had articles of incorporation
    in September 2005.

    Then came the hard part: articulating the precise responsibilities of the
    Foundation. This conversation took months, but ultimately it came back
    around, again and again, to a single question: "What could a Fedora
    Foundation accomplish that the Fedora Project, with strong community
    leadership, could not accomplish?"

    So here, in order, were the possible answers to that question -- and why
    we found, in every single case, that the Fedora Foundation was not the
    right answer.

    ONE: The Fedora Foundation could be an entity for the development of an
    open source patent commons.

    This was the obvious starting place, and what we actually announced. One
    of the lurking concerns of the open source community is the threat of
    software patents. The Fedora Foundation could have been an ideal
    repository for defensive patents. We envisioned soliciting patentable
    ideas from businesses and/or individuals,

  3. Opps. by DAldredge · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Thanks for the reminder!

    I LIKE PICKLES!!!

  4. Skype by da007 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    " providing hard core data to make complex architectural decisions."

    The "hard core data" is that if you use AMD with Red Hat then they're going to limit the number of TCP connections you can make.