Slashdot Mirror


Advances in Bio-weaponry

kjh1 writes "Technology Review is running an eye-opening article on how biotechnology has advanced to the point where producing bio-weapons that were once only possible with the backing of governments with enormous resources is now possible with equipment purchased off eBay. You can now purchase a mini-lab of equipment for less than $10,000. The writer also interviewed a former Soviet bioweaponeer, Serguei Popov, who worked at the Biopreparat, the Soviet agency that secretly developed biological weapons. Popov has since moved to the US and provided a great deal of information on the types of weapons the Soviets were developing."

3 of 279 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Move Along by Compuser · · Score: 0, Troll

    You are missing the point. Say your neighbor gets pissed off enough to
    want to play god. He get your hair, engineers a weapon and the next
    thing you know all your family is dead and noone else notices. That's
    what genetic targeting allows (potentially, but I am sure it'll be
    practical in not too distant future).
    Also, think KKK developing a color-of-skin based agent. You could exploit
    local cuisine so that only people who eat, say sushi die. The possibilities
    are endless. Imagine if every case modder today became humanity modder
    tomorrow (by killing off unwanted specimens). Aha, now you are
    seeing the problem.

  2. Re:Now think about "mutation". by Compuser · · Score: 0, Troll

    As someone who is doing research in molecular biology right now in a major US
    university (at a postdoctoral level), let me assure you a lack of decent edumacation
    in the field of biology is not the problem. The problem is that most people will
    not consider mutations as something that can affect them. Once this technology
    becomes available to 14 year olds and doable with classroom equipment, all bets
    are off. And let's not forget the people who are depressed and want to see their
    offender dead and they don't care about the world or themselves. And this is before
    we even mention terrorists and nation states which TFA was concerned with.

  3. Re:Yeah, whatever. by Compuser · · Score: 0, Troll

    First, we are assuming that technology gets cheaper and easier to use.
    Sure, today it is still complicated and requires much education to do
    this. Tomorrow, it may well be taken for granted. Remember how coding
    was complicated in the fifties, how programmers were a small group who
    had training and how designing programs was hard. Now you have ten year
    olds building viruses that infect half the internet.
    If you are saying, am I afraid that a virus designed by a lone goon
    out of spite will strike tomorrow the answer is no. The day after
    tomorrow is very worrysome though.
    BTW, what's your obsession with guns? They do minimal damage. They may
    take out ten people, maybe a few more. If you are pissed at the world or
    maybe a race then guns aren't up to the task. If you want
    to kill your neighbor and his family, including those cousins in
    Australia and kids who moved to Canada, then a virus which infects
    everyone and strikes with specificity is far more attractive than a
    gun (need to procure it without leaving a trace, smuggle across
    borders, dedicate time and money to travel - a virus that could be
    engineered in an evening for $100 in chemicals is far more attactive).
    As you can see, it is only a matter of viruses getting more
    convinient to design and cheaper to make before this explodes. Right
    now TFA estimates that it takes $10K and untold amount in education
    expenses to make some agents. We can assume that the complexity will
    grow and cost will decrease. We are not that far, time to start
    planning now.