Slashdot Mirror


Ifolder Server Review

liquidat writes "I wanted to have a look at the new Open Source ifolder-server and additionally at ifolder in general. ifolder is mainly supported by Novell, and Novell advertises it's Suse Linux, so I downloaded a Suse-VMware image, installed the vmware player and gave it a try. After I installed the needed software it worked pretty well and gave me a quite good impression of what ifolder is about."

5 of 98 comments (clear)

  1. iFolder for Windows -- locking issues?! by garcia · · Score: 4, Informative

    I haven't used iFolder (on Windows/Novell) since 2005 but that's because of horrible locking. We were using it to share a "log file" document for keeping track of what documents were mailed from our department across two campuses.

    I was the main user of this document and would add 50 to 60 entries at any one time. iFolder wouldn't let me know that someone else had the file open and if I would save it with the other person's version open, I risked losing my work (which happened twice before I scrapped the idea and moved to another solution which included using a shared e-mail folder in Groupwise).

    iFolder, at the time, was insecure, slow, and problematic. Hopefully with it going out to the community these issues will be resolved.

    1. Re:iFolder for Windows -- locking issues?! by shrapnull · · Score: 4, Informative
      Maybe that would be a nice feature, but it's not what it's designed to do.

      iFolder

      --
      If you're half as beautiful naked, you'd be 4 times as beautiful with twice as many clothes on.
    2. Re:iFolder for Windows -- locking issues?! by baptiste · · Score: 4, Informative
      I assume you were using v2. v2 had no sharing ability (so you probably used a single userid for that iFolder) and I can see why you would have had locking problems. It seems like a normal NSS folder (since you mention you had Novell) would have been MUCH better as NSS has built in version control for files.

      v3 has much better sharing support in it, but even then, for the use case you describe, an NSS folder would be the way to go.

  2. Re:What is ifolder? by soccercoach62 · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to http://www.ifolder.com/: " iFolder is a simple and secure storage solution that can increase your productivity by enabling you to back up, access and manage your personal files-from anywhere, at any time. Once you have installed iFolder, you simply save your files locally-as you have always done-and iFolder automatically updates the files on a network server and delivers them to the other machines you use. Sponsored by Novell, the iFolder project is built on the Mono/.Net framework to integrate seamlessly into existing desktop environments. "

  3. Re:FTP by baptiste · · Score: 4, Informative
    FTP/SCP requires the server be accessible via a network unless you manually keep copies locally on your laptop for instance. iFolder syncs files between a server store and your local machine (or multiple machines) so you always have a copy. Microsoft Offline Files are a similar concept though I always found the way iFolder handled the sync to be much cleaner than they way MS did it.

    All syncing is done over normal SSL HTTP connections (at least in v2 it was)

    So iFolder ensures you'll always have your files available, even if you have no network connection (on a plane, etc) and when you get that connection back, makes sure everything is synced.

    Really cool use case? Executives with assistants. Executive is travelling - they have all their files locally and those files get 'backed up' to a server when they get connected. But if the assistant has updated a bunch of files as well, the executive will get those updates pushed to their laptop during the next background sync (say in a hotel)

    Think an automated version of rsync over ssh. iFolder uses a totally different architecture and has a lot of management and sharing features, but at its simplest use, syncing two folders between a PC and a server, it accomplishes what rsync over ssh would.