Slashdot Mirror


Revisiting Another World

The Delphine Software title Another World was a singular experience in early 90's gaming. The game is coming back to life in the here-and-now, in the hands of creator Eric Chahi. From the Edge Online article: "It's a collector's re-issue, not a remake ... When I created Another World I was already thinking that one day it would be able to run on higher end computers. The idea was to create something that respected the original release, so the enhanced backgrounds are in harmony with the flat polygon animations. And, of course, the game in its original 16 color form will be available too."

28 comments

  1. Soap opera by booch · · Score: 3, Funny

    I didn't realize that there was a big demand for games based on soap operas. (I guess that's why the game was renamed in the US.)

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    1. Re:Soap opera by doti · · Score: 1

      You gessed right. Just read the second (as of now, it's a wiki :) item in the Trivia section of the Wikipedia linked article. I played that game entirely, and loved it. The sound effects were stunning, even without a sound card. It was one of the first games to use the PC speaker to make realistic sounds. I connected the speaker from the motherboard into real large stereo speakers just to play this game. The sound was frightening.

      --
      factor 966971: 966971
  2. A look on things to come? by dada21 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since I'm 32, many of my favorite games are those that remind me of my gaming youth. Days playing Astrosmash on the Intellivision with pops, or playing Utopia on the Aquarius with my friends -- these were low res but very high fun-factor games that today's batches don't really compete well with (for me). Even newer games like Dreamcast's Chu-Chu Rocket tend to give me more hours of fun, mostly because the basic games seem to need less hardware, less overhead, and give me more playing time. I guess the lower resolution adds to the imagination-creation that tabletop gaming created, too.

    I've been thinking often about how the old games could be refreshed and renewed, but I can't figure out if it would be feasible. MOST gaming companies will re-create the game with the mess of 3D animation, large storage needs and slow cut-scenes, probably destroying them in the process. Civ4 is the most frustrating game I've ever played, I even battled to return it to the store since the only way to get it to work was to pirate it (the boxed release didn't work on 6 different PCs). Sid can go choke on my box for all I care -- the love of the game is gone.

    Yet I do see the "50 games for $5" that contain some of my favorite games of my youth -- Sinistar, Pole Position, Joust, Galaga, you name it. Thinking back, were these games my favorite because that is all we had at the local teen hang-out? I don't think so, we spent enough time at the super arcade to get our pick of 100 machines. Are they "the best" because they're from my childhood? I'm not sure, as my friend's 3 kids love to play them at our house, moreso than any of their X-box games. Are the games still powerful because they have some uniqueness to them? Not at all, there is just something about the story+gameplay+graphics that pulls you in.

    I wish I could figure it out, I've been dying to create something similar to the old games, but without making a copy. Tying some of the best features together might be a real winner, especially now that almost every cell phone can run most older games with better speed, maybe there is a new market for bringing the old tech back.

    Can you imagine Space Quest 3 on a Samsung d500?

    1. Re:A look on things to come? by Radres · · Score: 1, Troll

      Go play Resident Evil 4.

      Then tell me how today's games stink.

      I think it's just that the people who used to game don't know where to look to find the new good games. We look back on gaming history and only remember the good games. There were just as many crappy games (Battletoads) then as there are now.

    2. Re:A look on things to come? by dada21 · · Score: 1

      There WERE a lot of crappy games, but today's "great" games seem to be a huge hassle to play. Almost every game I've bought in the past 4 years has been returned (with restocking fee if necessary) because of compatibility issues.

      I'm a geek, I have very high end hardware, I've tried all the various OSes and drivers and software patches, and they still have issues.

      The X-Box and whatever Sony's machine was called are good to a point, but many of them are just more eye-wash window-dressing gorgeous graphics that forgot to focus on play-factor. The controller is too complicated, IMHO, to make the game fun and exciting.

      I still do find great games from time to time, though, but after I've won them once or twice, they go on eBay. I'll never give up Metroid, though.

    3. Re:A look on things to come? by daenris · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The X-Box and whatever Sony's machine was called are good to a point

      Wait. Whatever Sony's machine was called? Are you serious? And you're posting on Slashdot about games?

      Give me a second... I think my brain is going to explode :)

    4. Re:A look on things to come? by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Right.. firstly I can tell you why games today don't compare to yesterdays games. It's the same reason todays best cars don't get you from A to B as effective (cheaply) as yesterday. We have too much power so we forget that cars are vechiles not cock extensions.

      People forget that games are ment to be fun. The thing aboy all those classic games is "lets just STFU and play, have a giggle, go home and we're done". It didn't try to change the world, impress you or dazzle you with eye candy. It just tried to entertain you..

      If you have a PS2 give ICO a try. The US version has some stuff missing (nothing too major, just 1 puzzle is made easier and the replay features are removed (but nothing gamefaqs can't give you with less effort). It's a classic puzzle game, but it's beautiful at the same time. Combat is a secondary part of the game which basicly revolves around "hit stuff and run away". But where it REALLY shines and becomes a classic is it has the old lemmings/Broken sword/point and click style gameplay. You see a puzzle and you stare at it for hours.. try to work every little part and then at the very last second when you're about to give up you notice you missed the smallest thing and were looking at the completely wrong thing..

      Simple things like a missed button or forgetting you can pull Yorda (the girl you lead around) up onto ledges changes a simple puzzle into hours of searching and trying.. but it's worth a rental if nothing else. Maybe you will see that not all games are about flash, some are beautiful while playing just like yesterday.

      --
      I like muppets.
    5. Re:A look on things to come? by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness I can't think at the moment what Sony's machine was called. Was it Dreamcast? I like older stuff ... Atari 2600, 5200, Nintendo, early Super Nintendo, Epyx games on my Apple II. I just don't like what people call a "game" today for the most part. (I enjoy Freeciv. Does that count?)

    6. Re:A look on things to come? by dada21 · · Score: 1

      I still find myself playing my Lynx, too. Freeciv is decent, I need to get that re-installed.

      I still love Utopia on my Aquarius (great game, I wonder if there is a PC version that is low res). I also play a ton of Dreamcast when I have time -- I once had a Dreamcast in my old Subaru RS :)

    7. Re:A look on things to come? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Recommendations:

      A: One developer, working full time. Get a tight iteration time on the gameplay and code side, making changes as you go.
      B: Incredibly limited scope. You're not making the world's greatest space opera: you're making a 5-minute title about flying around and shooting stuff (or what have you)
      C: Release early, release often. Make one thing and move on to make another.

      Flash games are probably the way to go. Orisinal has a lot of original games in this vein.

      Games like this are cheap enough to be developed on an ad-supported basis, and lots of them are. Some of them, like Orisinal's stuff, are made on the side in the evenings whenever he feels like it. And some of it, like Puzzle Pirates, fit into a larger metasystem that is not ad-supported.

      Smaller games don't fit into traditional retail channels because the margins are not big enough to support the overhead. This appears to be changing with Xbox 360 Live, however, which should see a resurgance of originality on that console (and possibly all next-gen consoles).

    8. Re:A look on things to come? by daenris · · Score: 1

      Dreamcast was Sega. Sony is the Playstation/PS2 and eventually PS3. :)

    9. Re:A look on things to come? by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Last night for my birthday I received an Atari Flashback 2 from my wife, and it's one of the best gifts I can think of. (And it only cost $15 on ebay.) And there's a secret code to enable two paddle games, which I could never play on my old Atari because there was a problem with the jacks that kept them from working with paddles. We had a blast playing, with the baby crawling all over the place getting in the way. :)

  3. Linux/OS X and the demise of raw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have really fond memories of this game. Although sporting frustrating gameplay by today's standards, back then the graphics and atmosphere were nothing short of breathtaking.

    More recently I played through it again on Linux using the now-defunct raw that was shut down at the request of Eric Chahi.

    I see no mention of any versions of this updated release for anything other than Windows XP unfortunately. I'm hoping there will be a version for Linux/OS X as well because I just don't want to believe the original author shut down any hope of anyone not using Windows of playing this amazing game.

  4. Bravo!! by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    This is the type of classic re-issue I like to see! It really looks likethey've kept the heart and soul of the original, while subtly updating things just enough to match my subjectively enhanced memories of what the original was like.

    Yes, classic games industry, there are reasons why we liked the originals, and sometimes it's nice to revisit them without them being completely mutated beyond all recognition.

    I am so grabbign this when it comes out.

  5. Excellent by zoeblade · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The original game was already beautiful, with stunning animation (achieved by rotoscoping, soon to become popular again when A Scanner Darkly comes out). It was really quite amazing considering it was all "conceived, written, programmed, drawn, and rendered by one individual" (see the Wikipedia link). This looks like an update that actually stays true to the original, making it closer to what its creator originally wanted to make had the technology existed at the time, only with a slightly slicker look. Let's hope it is as good as it looks.

  6. A true classic, but worth reviving? I dunno. by HunterZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Another World (known to me as Out of this World) was a truly great game. The graphics were something vastly different from anything else at the time, and were beautiful and immersive in an odd way. The game also unfolded a story without a single line of dialogue; you really felt like you were running through some alien world where you had no idea what was going on, but were too busy trying to stay alive to stop and figure it out.

    Then there was the frustration. Many parts of the game are so frustrating that I remember wanting to smash my monitor with my keyboard. Being able to continue an unlimited number of times just meant that I had to perform an intricate series of jumps or combat moves hundreds of times just to get *to* the part where I kept dying. In the end it was worth it (the late part of the game and the ending music were pretty cool, although the open ending was a little bit of a letdown after the effort involved), but you can bet your ass I've never tried to seriously play the game since.

    I'm not sure what I think of the idea of bringing this game back in an enhanced form. I looked at the screenshots and they weren't what I was hoping for. Something much more detailed is currently possible; the screenshots look like they just touched up the background art and rendered the flat polygon foreground models in a higher resolution, and it looks like something that would have run on Windows 95. What they really ought to do is render the game world in 3D from the same perspective, and place even higher-res, shaded flat polygon models into the scene. They could still easily retain the abstract polygon look of the original (I've seen it done in 3D console games) while achieving a much more immersive and higher quality effect. Unfortunately the current "touch up" will probably kill any chance of that, unless they turn this game into another Myst by releasing new versions every couple of years for the next decade (which I think is not feasible due to the game's more frustrating aspects, which will undoubtedly limit its mass appeal).

    One final thought: I hope they also remember to touch up the sound and music. Some additional ambient background music during the actual game would be really really nice.

    --
    Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
    1. Re:A true classic, but worth reviving? I dunno. by spyrochaete · · Score: 1

      Yes, this game was friggin hard. I'm not sure there's a market for such a twitchy arcadey experience these days, but I'm all for a remake if it will introduce this gorgeous game to a new generation.

    2. Re:A true classic, but worth reviving? I dunno. by Frenchy_2001 · · Score: 1

      Something much more detailed is currently possible; the screenshots look like they just touched up the background art and rendered the flat polygon foreground models in a higher resolution, and it looks like something that would have run on Windows 95. What they really ought to do is render the game world in 3D from the same perspective, and place even higher-res, shaded flat polygon models into the scene. They could still easily retain the abstract polygon look of the original (I've seen it done in 3D console games) while achieving a much more immersive and higher quality effect.

      As you said, this won't happen. Eric explains on his website the reason for this update: someone thought about porting his game to cell phones (yes, cell phones!), their small LCD screens needed more contrasts. As he touched up the graphisms for the cell phones, he realized he could update the engine for the PC version and did so. The graphisms are just more contrasty and slightly more precise, taking advantage of higher resolutions (up to 16x, 4x in each direction).

      This is not a full rewrite of the code, just a small update.

      He has more projects coming up though it seems. Eric has a love affair with video games that comes and goes. He has been out of this business for a few years (since heart of darkness) and seems ready to come back.

      As for flashback, this belongs to Delphine Software, so if they re-release it, it would be an effort independant from this one (although they could enjoy the advertisement).

  7. We want a sequel! And Flashback! by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    I'd really appreciate it if Delphine not only published the game, I also want to play a sequel (and one with more levels, winning the game is possible in 30 minutes).

    Also, Flashback ABSOLUTELY ROCKED. I WANT MORE!

    1. Re:We want a sequel! And Flashback! by Haeleth · · Score: 2, Informative

      winning the game is possible in 30 minutes

      Make that 17 minutes and 20 seconds.

    2. Re:We want a sequel! And Flashback! by yagang · · Score: 1

      There was a sequel called Heart of the Alien. It was only released on SegaCD though.

    3. Re:We want a sequel! And Flashback! by zmower · · Score: 1

      Heart of Darkness. It was on the PC too.

      --

      Sig pending!
    4. Re:We want a sequel! And Flashback! by yagang · · Score: 1

      No. Not Heart of Darknes. Heart of the Alien.

  8. Aaarrrgh by FroBugg · · Score: 1

    I played this game back in the day on my Amiga 500. In the past couple years I discovered it was released for SNES, so I was able to play an emu version on my current PC.

    It's one of the most beautiful games I've ever played, and the graphics style helps it look great even today, when most old games look old and crappy now.

    But it was also the hardest game ever. Each and every scene required precise timing to get through, and you'd have to play several scenes over and over and over. I never even got halfway through until I discovered some cheat codes to skip ahead.

    Beautifully frustrating.

    1. Re:Aaarrrgh by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      The beauty of emulating the SNES version is the ability to use save states. Had I not been able to instantly save/load any part of the game with my extra controller buttons, I'd have done a lot more crying.

    2. Re:Aaarrrgh by Explo · · Score: 1

      It was certainly one damn impressive game technically. The visual style was pretty much unique (a trait that I recall from several other French games as well; at least Captain Blood, the not-really-sequel Flashback that I nonetheless liked more and Passengers of the Wind), and even the gameplay felt different than your average arcade adventure.

      I always wondered if the makers of the State of the Art demo had been influenced by the game. (Well, it was not the first game ever to use rotoscoped graphics, but still...)

      --
      Everyone who makes generalizations should be shot.
  9. Good graphics but.. by 4D6963 · · Score: 1
    This game definitly had great graphics, I'd even say, memorable graphics, but there's something that distrubed me last time I played it.

    Besides the time it took me to find out how to find out of water, or how to slowly smash the lil black worms, this game is like, either try to find out by yourself what you gotta do, or follow a walkthrough and do what you're told to do. It's like it's not a game, it's more like you're watching a show and you gotta find which buttons to press to get to the next scene. That's how it felt to me

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:Good graphics but.. by Jurrasic · · Score: 1

      GHAAA those effing little black worms! I had a deep abiding love for this game from the first time I watched the intro sequence on my trusty Amiga 500, but I HATED that goddamn worm level more then anything, one slight overstep and it was poison fang death. Grrrr......no video game that old should inspire an instant upwelling of hate when a part of it is mentioned. Thats what makes it legendary! Ma-choo-ba!

      --
      Devil bunnies! I snort the nose! Lucifer! Banana! Banana!