Slashdot Mirror


Military Investigates Sale of Sensitive Data

smokeslikeapoet wrote to mention an article being run in the New York Times detailing the sale of sensitive data in Afghan markets. From the article: "The military acted after The Los Angeles Times and The Associated Press reported that computer memory drives smuggled out of the base were being sold in shops. Some drives bought by the reporters contained material marked secret as well as information about insurgency activities and names and personal details about American service members and Afghan agents working for the United States military." Fox News is reporting the sold storage units are being repurchased by the military as they can find them.

12 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. Does the military know about encryption? by dmonahan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or couldn't they get an export license?

  2. mis-information? by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While our military may sometimes seem incompetent, don't forget they are involved in informational warfare in many different ways you might never think of.

    I wouldn't be surprised in the least if some or all of this 'leaked' information has been crafted to make our enemies think we are doing things we are not.

    This is nothing new, look up operation mincemeat for a very interesting story of a successful mis-information mission performed in WW2.

    1. Re:mis-information? by s20451 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree that the military is capable of great things *sometimes*. But I have been in the military, and the military basically attracts the same caliber of employee as any other government department.

      What is more likely, that the military let classified data walk out the door due to incompetence, or due to some clever X-files style conspiracy? After you answer that question, replace "the military" with "the department of motor vehicles" and ask yourself again. The answer would usually be the same in both cases.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    2. Re:mis-information? by rchatterjee · · Score: 4, Interesting

      According to the original LA Times article the reporters were able to find actual soldier's SSNs which they were able to verify by tracking down the home addresses and personal vehicles of the soldiers.

      Granted the rest of the info could be false, but that would mean they're deliberately leaking troops' personal info which could be putting their families at home in some real danger.

  3. Win-win solution. by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here's a win-win solution: Send the old hard drives and other media to our units in Iraq. They can duct-tape them to their Humvees and use them as armor.

    The bene's:
    1) If the Iraqis steal the media, it'll be useless: the electricity in Iraq is never on long enough to scan a drive.
    2) If you leave the media taped to a Humvee long enough you'll be guaranteed to achieve true data destruction.

  4. Umm.... by KarateExplosions · · Score: 5, Funny
    Fox News is reporting the sold storage units are being repurchased by the military as they can find them.


    Fuck that repurchasing shit. TAKE IT. You're the goddamned United States military.
  5. Re:Windows WinPC by yogikoudou · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was going to say the same. How is it possible that Fox News reporters could even open the data files ?
    One could expect that everything is encrypted, every single file being a part of a globla security policy, etc.
    This is the army ! Big companies protect their sensible data by ensuring each sensible file is properly encrypted, defining trust circles, and strict key management policies. How were the files stored ? .DOC or .PDF files on USB keys ? I wonder how this is even possible.

  6. Why "repurchase" the drives? by FellowConspirator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What point is there to repurchasing the drives? Once the information is out, it's out. Anyone that would be interested isn't interested in the drives, they are interested in the data -- data that's easily copied and transmitted in a couple of minutes. All you are doing is paying people to get back a USB key, the data on which they've already sold someone else.

    Heck, let them keep the drive as a keepsake. If the information is misinformation, maybe it will propagate farther. If it's real information, the damage is already done, there's really no point in rewarding for it.

  7. Poor IT Security Governance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Storing unencrypeted sensitive data on a PC is bad enough, on a Laptop it's even worse - but who the hell is allowing the US Military to store classified data on REMOVABLE MEDIA? I work in Information Security for a Fortune 5 company, and we have banned the use of all removable media for just this reason, it has a tendency to travel. Is the US Military so obtuse as to believe that their people will never misplace on of these devices, much less walk off with them?

  8. What? They're repurchasing them? by Keyslapper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fox News is reporting the sold storage units are being repurchased by the military as they can find them

    Why the hell are they repurchasing their own porperty?

    Isn't that going to turn theft of military equipment and information into a whole economy?

    Don't get me wrong, I don't think we should be there in the first place (IMHO, what little real benefit either the US or Iraq could ever hope to gain is nowhere near worth the lives of all those that have died), but if some bastard swipes my laptop, and I find out where it is, the last damn thing I'm going to do is buy it back. I don't care if the guy holding it is the one who stole it or not, he's not getting a nickle for something that's mine.

  9. it's not the first time. by jerky42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back a few years ago, I was wandering around a flea market in a 3rd world country. This country had a US base in it that was destroyed by a natural disaster some years before. As I wandered past a stall with some ancient electronics in it, I happened to notice a new-looking KY-58 radio sitting there.
    For those that don't know, a KY-58 is a secure voice radio that is still in use today in some USAF aircraft. It cost about $50,000 new.
    Amazed by this, I asked the guy if it worked. He said "Sure, I just had it hooked up." I said, "how much?" He said, "100 US$". I said "Show me, and I'll buy it." He tried valiantly to hook it up, but the custom power plug, and the fact that it ran on 28v DC and 400 Hz AC defeated him, so I gave him $50 for it, and flew back home, and turned it in to the Air Force Office of Special Investigations. They said "Thanks", and I never got my $50 back.

    --
    The strong do what they can, while the weak suffer what they must.
  10. Re:Windows WinPC by tsm_sf · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course, when we discarded a computer, we removed the harddrives, open them up, used a belt-sander on the platters, then put the platters in an incinerator that was hot enough to melt them.

    I was going to ask why you'd bother using a belt sander on something you were just going to melt anyway, but then I realized how much fun that would be.

    --
    Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.