Lessons from the Browser Wars
An anonymous reader writes to mention a piece on the Harvard Business School site talking about Lessons from the Browser Wars; specifically, what can be learned about first-mover advantages and the upsurge in Firefox use? From the article: "As a tool for exploring how standards are set when new technologies hit the market, the browser wars exhibit many features we like to study: competition between two viable alternatives, rapidly improving technologies, the ability of firms to use strategic levers such as market power and channels of distribution, growth in demand leading to diffusion of the new technology through the population, and uncertainty. Thus, this is one example from which we can generalize lessons regarding the outcome of diffusion of innovation into a market."
"Better" is more complicated than just having superior technology. Open formats helps make a product better. In the case of video, cheap porn makes the product better. Saying Sony's product was better is a very narrow view.
On se Internetz nobody noes your German.
The thing that did in the Beta format was the fact Matsushita Electric--who has a majority controlling interest in JVC (the inventor of the Video Home System)--licensed VHS technology at far lower cost than what Sony wanted for Beta licenses. That got everyone to climb aboard the VHS bandwagon, and by 1990 VHS pretty much won by default.
The biggest advantage was that JVC was able to match Sony's every technological move--especially Hi-Fi sound and high-quality video--while maintaining its advantage of longer recording times over what Sony offered.