Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Microsoft Bypasses HOSTS File

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the they-know-what's-best dept.

whitehatlurker writes "Dave Korn announced on the Full Disclosure and Bugtraq security lists that Microsoft is bypassing local lookups for some hosts, meaning that you can't locally block some sites through your HOSTS file. All of these sites are MicroSoft controlled sites. The general feeling in the rest of the thread is that this was to obfuscate these hosts and prevent them from being blocked by malware. However, there are no non-MicroSoft hosts listed, giving a competitive advantage for MicroSoft's anti-malware tools over other brands."

3 of 459 comments (clear)

  1. Re:So what? by Aaden42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, no... You just *license* the farm. MS still owns it. For a nominal fee, they'll let you step in the cow pies every second Tuesday.

  2. Re:Permissions? by Homology · · Score: 5, Funny
    So ... if a user level virus couldn't write to the host file ...

    Think about it.

    Dear Tom,
    this is Slashdot and the term "think" does not apply.

  3. Re:Is this necessarily a bad thing? by DrSkwid · · Score: 5, Funny

    > I didn't even know about the hosts file until 5 minutes ago

    and already you feel qualified to comment

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter