Is Microsoft Silent Before a Deadly Storm?

M$FTjack writes "Discussions about Microsoft are all over the place, esp. with its recent delays to Vista. Some consider Microsoft to be doomed, while others say Microsoft is silent before a deadly storm. According to the article on CoolTechZone, the author believes that Microsoft will unleash an abundance of next-generation applications that will take everyone by surprise. From the article: 'So why am I citing all these examples? Simply because I think Microsoft is itself poised for a big leap. Despite all the rumors about Google and how it will topple Microsoft, I don't see that happening in the near future ... people (and I don't mean technology enthusiasts) will continue to purchase Microsoft products simply because of the sheer familiarity and comfort levels (BSoD et al) that they have with Microsoft software.'"

Comments

Re:Microsoft is never silent before the storm.

[ergo98]

But yes, it was likely delayed more than a "few months" at least due to them deciding to throw out the XP kernel and base it on Server 2003's instead.

They didn't "decide" to make the kernel transition. Rather, much like Duke Nukem Forever, technology changed so much while they were in development that they saw now loss in changing the "engine". In the process they dumped much of the work they have completed, and started largely anew.

It was the result of the first iteration being a complete disaster.

Re:I doubt it

[baadger]

Well I dual boot with 64bit Gentoo Linux and having native 64 bit compiled applications does bring a certain amountof geeky satisfaction. On the other hand it brings annoyances when packages are unstable or unuseable on AMD64.

It's upto application developers to release 64 bit builds, but for most apps it just isnt necessary or bring any performance benefits. That said, off the top of my head there are 64 bit builds of 7zip and SmartFTP.

Re:Doomed!?

[Leon_Trotsky]

True, but don't they only have 2 profitable divisions (windows and office)?

Re:Microsoft is never silent before the storm.

[NDPTAL85]

No they promised to deliver it in 2004 back when it was still being called Longhorn. So its still 2 years late.

Re:Beware Office 2007, it is that good.

[CrayDrygu]

The killer feature is this: the first major UI overhaul in Office since...well, ever.

How much of an improvement is it? Testers are discovering "brand new features" that have been there since Office 95, because they can finally _find_ the settings. No more traversing confusing menus and dialogs to change formatting options. Everything's grouped intelligently, instead of doing things like dumping anything from spell check to collaboration to mail merge into a "Tools" menu. Style-based formatting has been made easier. And best of all, no more toolbars that appear and disappear, and no more task pane.

If you want the details, read the "Why the UI" series in Jensen Harris's blog (he's the program manager for the Office "user experience" team) -- http://blogs.msdn.com/jensenh/archive/category/117 20.aspx

Re:Microsoft is never silent before the storm.

[Mateo_LeFou]

"If I recall correctly, Vista/Longhorn was supposed to be out in 2004"

wik says 2003
link

I get them fairly regularly in XP still but ...

[TheAxeMaster]

But that's because of crap hardware drivers (Cheap ass VIA chipset), it has nothing to do with the OS. As is probably 90-95% of the BSoD in windows these days, some obscure or shitty piece of hardware that someone bought just because it was cheap.

Re:Microsoft is never silent before the storm.

[anaesthetica]

You're right. I ran a Nexis search, and the earliest mention of Longhorn (July 30, 2001) has Microsoft saying late 2002 (if everything goes right) or early 2003 otherwise.