Slashdot Mirror


Philips Patents Technology to Force Ad Viewing

An anonymous reader writes "According to New Scientist, Philips has filed a patent for technology to force viewers to watch the ads in a program. Basically they plan to add extra flags to the Multimedia Home Platform that would stop controls from working until the ads are finished." From the article: "Philips' patent acknowledges that this may be 'greatly resented by viewers' who could initially think their equipment has gone wrong. So it suggests the new system could throw up a warning on screen when it is enforcing advert viewing. The patent also suggests that the system could offer viewers the chance to pay a fee interactively to go back to skipping adverts."

19 of 823 comments (clear)

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. Well... by StevenHenderson · · Score: 5, Funny
    Philips' patent acknowledges that this may be 'greatly resented by viewers'

    Hard to resent something you will never buy.

    1. Re:Well... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is Slashdot. Fuck the masses!

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  3. next up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    a tv that realizes you've gotten up to get a sandwich and replays the commercials when you return.

    MY GOD, THIS IS PROGRESS?!!?

  4. clockwork tv chair by (chubbstar) · · Score: 5, Funny

    the next step is to simply have metallic arms come out of your chair, pin your arms down, peel your eyeballs open, and moisturize those pupils for 3 minutes.

    --
    "when you fall in a bottomless pit you die of starvation."
    1. Re:clockwork tv chair by owlstead · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, with "Ludwig van" music playing all the time.

  5. Re:offensive by cgenman · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, if you just pirate the movie you can skip the adverts.

    Hmm... There should be some lesson in there about giving consumers more for their money, but as far as I can tell that just means more adverts.

  6. Re:OK fine by iotaborg · · Score: 5, Funny

    You clearly have not read the patent. There was something about chains, locks, and first born children in there.

  7. Re:Well look on the bright side... by product+byproduct · · Score: 5, Funny
    In summary:
    • Patents are wrong.
    • This technology is wrong.
    • Two wrongs make a right.
  8. No honey... by jfclavette · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not watching porn ! *Clicks button desperately*

  9. Another patent will prevent this by sgant · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't think you get it. You're FORCED to watch the advertisements.

    Part of this system will be eye-instruments similar to the ones used in A Clockwork Orange that keep the lids of your eyes fully open and staring directly into the screen. There will be no way of skipping the ads nor averting your eyes away from the ads.

    Of course, for a small fee you can avoid all of this.

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
  10. Sid Meier and my money ... by joe_n_bloe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pretty soon it will be cheaper and less annoying to go see movies in the theater.

    I guess I'll have plenty of former TV time to perfect my Civilization IV skills. Or I could write another book.

    But Civ IV first.

  11. Still fine by me by einhverfr · · Score: 3, Funny

    It seems likely that we have until the patent expires before non-Phillips products can use this technology without paying licensing fees. :-) Also means no open source implementations for about 17 years...

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:Still fine by me by Fareq · · Score: 4, Funny

      Since it's the Digital Millenium Copyright Act of 1998, I'd say that 6 years ago we had a pretty good idea!

      (yes, I know that wasn't helpful)

    2. Re:Still fine by me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you Canadian by any chance?

  12. Text of On-Screen Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    So it suggests the new system could throw up a warning on screen when it is enforcing advert viewing.

    "Warning: Phillips electronics engineers are clueless asspirates. Their marketing weasels are worse. While you're watching this shit, they're busy thinking up the next stupid-ass idea."

    The patent also suggests that the system could offer viewers the chance to pay a fee interactively to go back to skipping adverts.

    Also known as extortion.
  13. Re:Well look on the bright side... by myowntrueself · · Score: 5, Funny

    Two wrongs make a right is like saying "two lefts make a right"
    They don't. Two lefts means you're going backwards.


    So what you are saying, and let me make absolutely certain that I understand your reasoning here, you are saying that *three* wrongs make a right?

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  14. Prior art. by edunbar93 · · Score: 4, Funny

    And I quote:

    "Where I was taken to, brothers was like no cinnie I ever viddied before. I was bound up in a straightjacket and my gulliver was strapped to a headrest with like wires running away from it. Then they clamped like lodlocks on my eyes so that I could not shut them, no matter how hard I tried."

    Sorry guys. This has already been done by the guys who made A Clockwork Orange, circa 1971.

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  15. Re:Fine by me. by Carthag · · Score: 4, Funny

    I really like the companies that set themselves apart by not showing any ads. I can't remember what they're called though. ;)