Slashdot Mirror


New Internet Regulation Proposed

bumgutts writes "Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has suggested a mandatory website self-rating system. The system, very similar to one suggested under Clinton's administration, would require by law all commercial websites to place 'marks and notices' on each page containing 'sexually explicit' content, with penalty up to 5 years imprisonment." From the article: "A second new crime would threaten with imprisonment Web site operators who mislead visitors about sex with deceptive 'words or digital images' in their source code--for instance, a site that might pop up in searches for Barbie dolls or Teletubbies but actually features sexually explicit photographs. A third new crime appears to require that commercial Web sites not post sexually explicit material on their home page if it can be seen 'absent any further actions by the viewer.'"

7 of 429 comments (clear)

  1. boobies by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Fark 'boobies' tag finally gets the nationwide recognition it deserves...

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  2. Re:What ? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 5, Funny

    the sites that still want to expose erotical/sexual content, would just move 1 inch outside the US

    Hi, you must be new to American diplomacy.

  3. What about Teletubbies sex sites? by adnonsense · · Score: 4, Funny
    "A second new crime would threaten with imprisonment Web site operators who mislead visitors about sex with deceptive 'words or digital images' in their source code--for instance, a site that might pop up in searches for Barbie dolls or Teletubbies but actually features sexually explicit photographs"

    One of my sites features prominent images of "Tinky Winky getting it on with the Noo-Noo", "Tubby Custard Full Facials", "Over the Hills and Far Away, Hot Barely Legal Teletubbies Come to Play - With Each Other and Also With a Mysterious Large Cylindrical Object" etc. etc.

    I hope that will not lead to legal misunderstandings which would put me in line for a stint of federally sponsored rectal enlargement.

  4. Re:The defense moves by fallungus · · Score: 2, Funny

    So I guess the Victoria's Secret site is going to be illegal,too?

    --
    You call this a sig?
  5. Re:Get your own! by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why is it that every time we hear about some bored schmuck wanting to regulate the internet, it's always an American ?

    Because we were colonized by the Pilgrims, a bunch of people so uptight even the British kicked them out.

  6. I've Got Fully Clothed Genital Regions by aplusjimages · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm looking at some porn right now, I just tilt my head down and there it is, my pants cover my genitals, therefore they are fully clothed genital regions. I'm so dirty.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  7. This Sex Thing Is Old Hat by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder if I'll be able to view my family's web site after I put on a rating for the genealogy information. It shows in there that people are making babies all over the country.