Slashdot Mirror


OpenBRR Launches Closed Open-Source Group

An anonymous reader writes "eWeek is reporting that SpikeSource co-founder and CTO Murugan Pal and the Open Business Readiness rating have launched a new initiative designed to maximize open-source software knowledge across organizations. While they are targeting corporate and Wall Street CIOs and IT directors as members, the current plan is not to open membership of the new OpenBRR Corporate Community to all, but to offer it on an invitation-only basis 'to ensure that only trusted participants are coming into the system,' Pal said. This would allow members to discuss sensitive issues and share information without having to worry that it would be made widely public, he said."

2 of 63 comments (clear)

  1. Headline doesn't reflect article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Closed Open Source!"

    When what really happens is that a set of industries try to meet up to discuss their common interests and how they can get it throug open source projects.

    An example would be banks getting together to discuss how they would link up to each other's ATM's securely without having to use closed software.

  2. Re:"Closed" Open Source by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Open source" implies .... wait for it ... open source code! Nothing else. Many OSS organizations -- like Debian -- also have an open and democratic development methodology, but this isn't required.

    I could get ten (or a thousand) of my best friends together, lock ourselves in a garage (warehouse), put a sign on the door that says "Windowz userz keep out!" and produce some piece of software, and then release it under the GPL without telling anyone about HOW we went about making up the code. Any internal documentation, functional specifications, etc., wouldn't need to be open. It's just the code that's protected under "open source." You can develop the software in any way you choose.

    Not all open source projects have to be Debian-like. That's just one way of developing; not everything has to be done like that. There's nothing in the OSS licenses themselves -- we can argue philosophy until we're all dead, naturally -- that prevents OSS development from being just as much of a "sausage factory" as proprietary development.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."