Seven Mobile ATA Hard Drives Compared

Posted by ryuzaki0 on Friday April 28, 2006 @03:36AM from the compare-and-win dept.

AnInkle writes "Though hard drives are allegedly the fastest advancing high-tech product, most laptop manufacturers persist in saving a buck by outfitting their units with a low-end, low-cache, low-capacity, low-spindle-speed HDD. The Tech Report takes a different angle from other mobile hard drive reviews by including one of those maligned 4,200 RPM, 2MB cache models in their roundup of 2.5" hard drives, which includes 'a 160 GB perpendicular monster and a couple of 7,200-RPM speed demons.' The results are clear that most of us would see a tremendous boost in performance by upgrading this one component."

1 of 125 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Re:It's Simple... by nfarrell · 2006-04-28 04:21 · Score: 5, Interesting

True, the other drives are ~$100 more expensive. If all you got was a 30% speed increase, I'd agree with you.

But these drives are not just faster, they're also higher capacity. An ipod holds more than these low-end drives, and anyone who wants their laptop to be their MP3 player will happily spend $100 extra for ~80Gb more space.

Yep, some people will buy the cheapest thing without looking at what they're missing out on. But it wouldn't be hard to market a lappy as "NEXT GENERATION: MASSIVE 100GB DISK DRIVE". But what would I know, I'm not in marketing.