Google Propping Up Typosquatting Biz?
An anonymous reader writes "Google is making oodles of cash placing ads on a vast sea of otherwise vacant Web sites that do little more than capitalize on misspelled domain name names, according to a story in today's Washington Post. From the story: 'Google Inc., which runs the largest ad network on the Internet, is making millions of dollars a year by filling otherwise unused Web sites with ads. In many instances, these ad-filled pages appear when users mistype an Internet address, such as BistBuy.com. This new form of advertising is turning into a booming business that some say is cluttering the Internet and could be violating trademark rules.'"
Typosquatter site BistBuy.com reports record profits and an all-time high hit count.
I blame DNS.
We should have stuck with numbers. In hex. Would have kept out all the lamers, nannies, and governments.
Heck we should go back to uucp over dial-up connections.
Back in the olden days of 2004, we used to call it "cybersquatting." Kids these days and their crazy terminology. And their music.
The Post claims, "Google Inc., which runs the largest ad network on the Internet, is making millions of dollars a year by filling otherwise unused Web sites with ads. In many instances, these ad-filled pages appear when users mistype an Internet address, such as 'BistBuy.com.'"
.com and .net domains can now be registered
I also couldn't open bistbuy.com --
Here's what searching whois for bistbuy.com gave me
Whois Server Version 1.3
Domain names in the
with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net/
for detailed information.
Domain Name: BISTBUY.COM
Registrar: DOMAINDOORMAN, LLC
Whois Server: whois.domaindoorman.com
Referral URL: http://www.domaindoorman.com/
Name Server: NS1.12GF6.COM
Name Server: NS2.12GF6.COM
Name Server: NS3.12GF6.COM
Status: REDEMPTIONPERIOD
Updated Date: 29-apr-2006
Creation Date: 22-nov-2005
Expiration Date: 22-nov-2006
Nothing appears to link bistbuy.com (if it ever was a valid destination) to Google.
I'm not convinced yet that this story is a smear job, but very little of their story appears to check out.