Slashdot Mirror


OpenBSD 3.9 Released

An anonymous reader writes "OpenBSD 3.9 was released this morning and is now available for download from the OpenBSD mirror sites. Among the new features is integrated framework for monitoring hardware sensors, a BSD licensed driver for nvidia nforce ethernet, and loads of new drivers and bug fixes. Of course you can still purchase the CD-ROM set which includes support for five platforms: i386, amd64, macppc, sparc, sparc64, and also includes the complete blob free source tree and prebuilt packages for many architectures. As always your contributions help to continue the devlopment of this great opeating system."

5 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. Dodos rejoice by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Interesting

    which includes support for five platforms: i386, amd64, macppc, sparc, sparc64

    at least you'll be able to do something with your old mac when Apple is done switching and pulls the plug on ppc support for good...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  2. Re:architectures? by The+Tyrant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OpenBSD has excelent Sparc support, and I for one am very happy about it, Sparcs make excelent firewalls and servers for small environments, mine currently has a quad fast ethernet card in the back thus meaning I dont need an extra hub in the server cupboard (just the four rooms it connects to) and combined with OpenBSD's excelent packet filter and rock solid security (which is even stronger on sparc since it can take advantage of quirks of the archetecture to defend against some attacks better) it makes an ideal server for me, runs nicely and doesn't even push the sparc that hard.

    Joke or otherwise, Sparcs are awesome machines (for some roles), and OpenBSD is an awesome system.

  3. Only OpenBSD supported my wireless card by dildo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After two weeks of attempting to get the various crappy beta-quality drivers to work on linux, I switched to OpenBSD to find that it supported my wireless card perfectly. (I have a PPC machine, so ndiswrapper was not an option.)

    Installing was also easy. If you have a little patience and are not afraid of a text-only install, starting OpenBSD was very easy.

    I like this operating system. The man files are comprehensive and well written, and even a person with limited technical experience (me) was able to get everything working fairly quickly.

  4. Source updates on a minimal system? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Frankly, this is crap. 10GB drive and you can't maintain a source tree???

    I could maintain a lot of stuff in 10GB, but given the sensitive nature of most OpenBSD installations (such as firewalls, etc.), GCC is not among the things I want to have around.

    According to the FAQ, three file sets are required for installation:

    • bsd
    • baseXX.tgz
    • etcXX.tgz

    Although that gets you a complete running system, it doesn't leave you with one that can self-host source updates. Given that I run exactly one OpenBSD machine at the office, I don't want to have a separate build server sitting around just to keep it updated. So, even though I have the hardware to support the process, and the technical skills to do so, it's still a major pain in the neck.

    Oh, and to those saying I should just install snapshots, the FAQ says:

    Between formal releases of OpenBSD, snapshots are made available through the FTP sites. As the name implies, these are builds of whatever code is in the tree at the instant the builder grabbed a copy of the code for that particular platform. Remember, on some platforms, it may be DAYS before the snapshot build is completed and put out for distribution. There is no promise that the snapshots are completely functional, or even install.
    Elsewhere on the site are other discouraging words:

    • /pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/
      For our major architectures, we tend to build mini releases of unknown stability and quality about every month or so. This is where we place those test releases.

    Ain't no way I'm going to tell my boss that my security update process involves "mini releases of unknown stability and quality". That is why I'd like to see "baseXX-r1.tgz" at ftp.openbsd.bsd (and it's mirrors) that holds nothing but the 3 or 4 binaries I'd need to upgrade on a stock system to bring it up to date. I'm not stupid or broke - just very time-challenged. I'd be happy to pay for a subscription to such a service were one available.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  5. Re:Rock Solid Already by pimpimpim · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've always had the easiest installs with openbsd, on a rather exotic motherboard with via C3 processor, I got my sound, video, IBM rapid access keyboard with all extra keys, etc working directly from install. I never had this with any linux version I tried. For the things I want to do: edit files, run a (web)server, listen to music, watch videos, OpenBSD gives me more than enough.

    So to me, OpenBSD is just a Good Thing (R) from a practical point of view. I don't bother to have the latest version of everything, but I'm happy when things "just work" ;) and you can trust that they are solid and safe.

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling