Slashdot Mirror


More Than 20 Years of the Web on the Big Screen

Carl Bialik from WSJ writes "WSJ.com has compiled clips from a dozen movies over the past 23 years that depict the internet, with varying degrees of accuracy. Among the selections: WarGames, Sneakers, .com for Murder, and Mr. & Mrs. Smith. The Matrix Reloaded used real Linux code, while Mission: Impossible had the improbable email addresses Job@Book of Job and Max@Job 3:14. In a related article, WSJ.com reviews some of the more-absurd Hollywood conventions when it comes to the web. Harry Knowles, of Ain't It Cool News, says, 'The thing that always gets me is watching people send emails. You click "send" and the entire document begins to fold into an envelope and disappear into the screen. I tend to send around 300 to 400 emails a day, and that would drive me insane.'"

23 of 536 comments (clear)

  1. The Web != The Internet by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Subject says it all.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  2. Woah there, headline by iamdrscience · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Web != The Internet

    Also, just to further nitpick, I don't think Wargames even had the internet in it -- he found WOPR by dialing it up directly.

  3. I remember "The Net" by daviddennis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not my kind of movie, seeing that the hapless heroine spent the whole bloody thing running away, without any kind of respite or comic relief or joy.

    That being said, I seem to remember it used a perfectly authentic looking traceroute, even if they had to give each row different colours to make it more visually appealing.

    Maybe my memory is failing, but the chat program used there didn't seem any more hokey than AOL chat or the average myspace profile. My theory is that most people quite like hokey.

    D

  4. Wow by koreaman · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe that list of inaccurate depictions left off Independence Day. No, you can't write a computer virus on your Mac and upload it to alien ships on the fly. And even if you could, it probably wouldn't show a pretty blue progress bar that said "uploading virus" while you did it.

    Honestly, that's the worst depiction of computers in film that I've ever seen

    1. Re:Wow by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny
      No, you can't write a computer virus on your Mac and upload it to alien ships on the fly.

      Maybe you can't...

    2. Re:Wow by mgblst · · Score: 5, Funny

      To be fair, the film screws up so badly in all areas, it would be weird if they got the computer stuff right.

      How did Jeff Goldblum's character figure out the alien signal?
      How did they know how to fly the alien ship?
      All of the characters in this film are stereotypical.
      The President of the United States of America flies a fighter plane against alien ships.
      The town drunk is a hero for no reason.
      I could come up with more, but like a child who had been molestered by her uncle, I don't like thinking about it too much.

      Possibly the most idiotic film of the past 30 years.

    3. Re:Wow by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a movie about a friggin' alien invasion, yet you complain about the computer stuff being unrealistic?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    4. Re:Wow by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I can't believe that list of inaccurate depictions left off Independence Day. No, you can't write a computer virus on your Mac and upload it to alien ships on the fly. And even if you could, it probably wouldn't show a pretty blue progress bar that said "uploading virus" while you did it.

      Actually, in fairness to the film, if you watch the special edition/director's cut that whole part makes a LOT more sense than the theatrical release which outraged us all so very much.

      In the director's cut, they add back enough footage to show that the communications of the aliens is sound/radio wave, and that he (Goldblum's character) had figured out the way their communications worked.

      He didn't write a computer binary virus on his Mac and upload it to the aliens. He used his Mac which had been outfitted with signal processing gear, and transmitted a series of signals which acted on their system in the way a virus would operate on a computer. So the bar could be the same as an upload status -- "this much more signal to transmit".

      As much as I thought it was a travesty when I saw the theatrical release, I thought the expanded version's explaination was plausible.

      Likewise, if you want to see a film that made no sense in theatrical release but becomes clear in extended release -- The Abyss is a good example. SO much of what was cut ouf ot he theatrical release caused it to become muddled and confusing. The extended release made sense.

      In both cases, the films were somewhat crippled by the way theye were initially released to the public, but SO MUCH BETTER in a director's cut.

      Anyway, just some musings from a film geek. :-P
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Wow by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Are you kidding me? Every night on CSI they zoom in 100x on digital photo and are able to make the photo clear as an original, with no pixelation. People have no idea what's possible with computers. They just assume that everything they see on television could really happen.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:Wow by sootman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Remember, that film took place in the System 7 days--the Mac OS *was* the virus. What you were seeing was the installation progress bar. :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  5. Visual Incremental Password Decryption by 4of12 · · Score: 4, Funny

    My favorite: the odometer/slot machine password cracking software, whirring the last few places as you hear the Bad Guy® coming down the hall...

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  6. Re:Accurate or not by amliebsch · · Score: 5, Funny
    Jason had some of the best lines

    For someone who claims to love the movie, I'd think you'd know it was Joshua, not Jason! Nerd card SUSPENDED!

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  7. Doogie Howser and SATC epitomize pop 'puters by ianscot · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The diary entries on "Doogie Howser, MD" and Carrie's "Sex and the City" word processor were about par for the course when it comes to computers in the pop media. Both shows posited worlds where computers were for t-y-p-i-n-g v-e-e-e-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y, in fonts that took up maybe 1/10 of the screen per line, so that the viewer could watch the appear over the character's shoulder. (Both shows also featured characters whose grand observations about life were invariably a single short sentence's worth of trite aphorism, or a simple question.)

    As a narrative device it's lame, okay, but frankly I'll take that over the postmodern delayed deus ex machine of the geek's solution to a technical problem: Oooh, our brainwizard has been working away steadily at a problem all plot long, and now that we're ten minutes shy of the ending, she's finally broken through the security system/discovered the answer to the riddle/broken the code. The writers may as well have Geordi adjust the trust old modulation on the phase transponder, it's the same plot device.

    Lately we're up to the level found in the funnies (other than FoxTrot): names get dropped. Ooh, she "googled" that term! That's about how far we've gotten with the Web in movies and TV... and the brain dead comic strip "B.C." for that matter.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  8. Re:Click click click by amliebsch · · Score: 4, Insightful
    And don't forget the clicking keyboards... Talk about driving you insane...

    All true geeks use a Model M.

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  9. Chloe O'Brien - Master H4Xx0r! by a_nonamiss · · Score: 4, Funny

    First off, I love the show 24, but when I watch it, I have to shut my computer nerd brain off.

    CHLOE: Jack, I'm going to open a socket to CTU so you can use your phone to upload the data from the thumb drive.
    JACK: I can't upload it. Something's wrong!
    CHLOE: It looks like the terrorists are trying to overload the router with IP addresses.
    JACK: Can you find out where it's coming from?
    CHLOE: I can't Jack, they're using a level 4 encryption algorhythm. It'll take me a few hours to decipher it.
    JACK: Maybe you can use some of the bandwidth from the FBI servers to help break the encryption!
    CHLOE: That might work, but I'll need level 5 network access from the FBI. I'll call you back!

    It's a damn good thing that show has other good qualities...

    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
  10. not only the web by kunzy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, this is a *Unix* system. I know all about this. --Jurassic Parc

  11. Re:Accurate or not by ccandreva · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For 1983, I think WarGames got far more right than it got wrong. You really could get free phone calls by shorting out an old-style rotary pay phone.

    You really can fake out any system that communicates via DTMF tones by recording and playing them back. Anyone remember hearing tones when you put money in early touch-tone payphones ? If that lock did communicate to a central system via DTMF, you could get out that way.

    Poor passwords used to be far more common. From 2006 Joshua looks like an obvious bad backdoor, but that's only because it used to BE so common.

    What did they get wrong ? WOPR was already an antique at the time, but they wanted something with blinking lights. There couldn't be a voice synth with the same voice everywhere. Often overlooked that complaint is the fact that they bothered to introduce it as a device at all.

    I always thought they presented it correctly as a cinematic device, sort of like a scene starting in a foreign language with subtitles, to establish the characters are foreign, then switching to English so the audiance knows what is going on.

  12. Re:jurassic park by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Informative

    Allthough that's a common complaint about that scene, the GUI she recognizes as UNIX was actually a real Silicon Graphics 3D File System Navigator for UNIX.

  13. EnHANCE that image! by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My family and I always love it when someone will zoom in ion some distant face in a scratchy webcam sht, get basically a twelve-pixel image, and magically "enhance" it to get a crystal-clear picture of some important bad guy or something, often when he was even facing the wrong way.

  14. Surveilance camera's by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can't believe they forgot this; I've seen it in dozens of movies and TV series, including "realistic" ones like CSI.

    Surveilance camera catches a blurred, grainy, black and white image with a 2x2 pixel head on it, software enhances the face into a highly detailed 3D model and even autodetects the name of the person.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  15. Re:Accurate or not by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Often overlooked that complaint is the fact that they bothered to introduce [a voice synth] as a device at all.

    And yet it was still surprisingly realistic. The Intellivoice module (a voice synthesizer with its own built-in speaker) was released for the Intellivision console in 1982, and the Macintosh "introduced" itself in 1984. It received a standing ovation from the crowd. And that's just what the public saw. The actual research into Voice Synthesis goes back to the 1930's!

    So it was perfectly reasonable to include voice synthesis in WarGames, even if its purpose was to allow the viewer to read less text.

  16. Re:Accurate or not by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Breaking launch codes a single digit at a time was one thing they got glaringly wrong

    Will people please stop complaining about this? If you've read Tanenbaum's book on Operating System Design, you'd know that this was a very real hack. In the system he describes (Tandem Computer, I think?), users could attach a listener to the page fault handler to know when a page fault happened. The system also checked passwords one character at a time.

    A common method of breaking the super-user password was to align the password with the page boundary. If a page fault occurred, the hacker would know that the correct letter or digit had been found. The hacker would then move the password one character back in memory so that the next digit would be over the page boundary. This process was repeated until all the characters were found.

    As a result, these computers were actually capable of being hacked "one character at a time" like you see in movies. Hollywood was just slow to update to the latest methods used.

  17. Re:Accurate or not by stunt_penguin · · Score: 5, Funny

    The main thing that they got wrong in that scene was the fact that he actually impressed an attactive young female with his hacking skills, rather than eliciting a blank stare, a yawn or a breakup.

    So unlike real life.

    --
    When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.