Slashdot Mirror


Americans Are Seriously Sick

jd writes "A study by US and British researchers on frequency of illnesses shows that even when you compare like groups in the US and the UK, people in the US are considerably sicker than their counterparts in the UK. This is after factors such as age, race, income, education and gender were taken into consideration. The most startling conclusion was that although the richest Americans were better off than the poorest Americans, they did no better (health-wise) than the poorest of the English. Previous studies of the entire population had shown similar results, with America placing around 25th amongst industrialized countries on chronic disease prevention, but it had been assumed that minorities and economics were skewing the results. This study suggests that maybe that isn't the case."

11 of 1,519 comments (clear)

  1. Answer is easy. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Have a look at table 8 in this report on industrial relations.
    Statutory minimum annual leave plus public holidays

    UK: 28 days (four weeks + public holidays)
    US: 10 days (0 weeks + public holidays)
    US's work culture of long working days, unpaid overtime & too few holidays is killing you. Add to that the stress of the burden of health care falling on individuals and you have the sort of mess tfa talks about.

    No doubt many other people are going to write in talking about "fat americans" being the problem - and its true that nutrition in America is a serious problem, but the comparison is to England, so not the cause of the differences.

    Personally, I work on average 8 months a year and spend the rest of the time travelling - I am rarely stressed and almost never sick.
    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Answer is easy. by Barnoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've never needed to miss a day off work yet, and I'm still vigorously healthy! But that's not because of any shirker reason like holidays, but because I eat correctly for the human body I have, which is to eat vegetarian.

      Don't think what's right for you is right for everybody.

      I know you'll shake your head at it like everybody does, but the typical vegetarian gets no cancer, never gets influenza (yes your flu last year could be avoided if you dumped meat) and will never have the depression, bowel disease, heart problems and overweight that inflict meat eaters!

      My mom's cousin has been a vegetarian since childhood. She died two years ago of breast cancer.

    2. Re:Answer is easy. by SerpentMage · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Having gone through multiple health care systems from 100% private to 100% public, let me say that you will not get a cheaper rate from private health care because it is not in their interest.

      1) To have a free market is to make money (not saying this is bad), but reality is that you can't make money with health care. Fixing a broken bone can be made profitable because it is a known science. Fixing a disease is not profitable and costs quite a bit of money. In your proposal where people "save" the money, ha! Diseases are a loss!

      2) In a private system there still would be paperwork. Paperwork exists to create accountability! In a private system people will want accountability.

      As much as I like free markets, health care and free market do not go together. Healthcare is a societal issue because health care from a profitability factor is a money looser. Healthcare is not like a car insurance. With a car you can try and avoid an accident, you can stop speeding. Accidents do happen, but there are ways to reduce them. Car accidents are human errors! Diseases on the other happen and there is nothing we can do to avoid them. They are a fact of life. You can diet, excercise, and lead a healthy lifestyle, but you can still be hit with cancer or some other disease! You can try to avoid them, but they will always hit you!

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    3. Re:Answer is easy. by SerpentMage · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No.... I am right here...

      Let's take cancer. People don't know where cancer comes from and think that some habits are better than others. Yet we all can get cancer, regardless if you excercise, etc. We think that certain habits will increase the liklihood, but we cannot say, "Excercise and you will not get cancer".

      Let me give you an example; Lance Armstrong, incredibly healthy and a great athlete, yet he was on the brink of death due to cancer. Or how about Andres Galarraga? Or how about Scott Hamilton? How about Mario Lemieux?

      This is why I say healthcare is a societal issue because healthcare saps money and is a money looser! With a spin on the car insurance ananlogy. When a driver has an accident we as a society don't mind charging that driver more or not giving him car insurance. If a person gets cancer can we say, "No you can't get coverage, you are on your own?" This is exactly what private healthcare providers do. I know, my mother survived breast cancer, but the private healthcare providers are refusing to cover her for cancer. If she gets cancer again she is on her own. This is wrong! But it is business because she is a "problematic" person.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  2. Re:This is a trash study by pryonic · · Score: 5, Insightful
    But the fact is that the NHS provides free treatment to ALL UK citizens, not just those who can afford it. In America you can be seen quickly as long as you're willing to pay. Fine if you can afford it or if your employer gives you health insurance, but if not you're screwed.

    I believe health care is a right, not a privilege for the rich, and I'm proud to pay my taxes towards the NHS that provides top notch treatment to EVERYBODY.

    I'm guessing you're one of the lucky ones with private health insurance. Try living on the povery line and making a choice between getting that lump looked at or eating for a month. I know what most people are forced to choose in your so called land of the free...

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  3. Call me a pessimist... by jgdobak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...but, working in the healthcare profession in the US, no one gets paid unless you're sick. Sadly, healthcare here is definitely for-profit. So of course we're all 'sick.'

    (Not a supporter of socialist programs in general, but healthcare is too important to be trusted to human greed.)

  4. Fast food by PenisLands · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe it's because of the fast food? I live in England and I eat pretty much entirely home cooked and prepared meals, except maybe apart from the odd sandwich from Sainsbury's.
    I recently went out to stay at a friends house for a weekend, and on the first day we ate McDonalds in the evening. The next day I was feeling pretty sick. All I ate about two burgers and some chicken nuggets.

  5. free as in beer by lovebyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let me quote this from the BBC article:
    Rates of smoking are similar in the US and England but alcohol consumption is higher in the UK.
    There you have it, folks, DRINK!

    (I am only half joking)

    --

    I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

  6. Re:Universal Healthcare? by Propagandhi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to TFA coverage isn't the issue here. The purpose of the study was to compare health across the board, not just of the working class or poor (who would benefit from a universal healthcare system) and it found that regardless of income Americans were less healthy than UKers. Which is bizarre, considering we (the US) are still the richest country in the world, and should therefore have the best top tier healthcare.. or at least one would think.

    At any rate, as cool as universal healthcare would be, TFA really isn't bringing that issue up. Rather, I think it alludes to the hire levels of stress or maybe more generally the unhealthy ways we Americans live. Universal Healthcare can't make you sleep 8 hours every night or eat all your vegetables, and I think that's really the point that should be driven home by the article... as Americans, we just aren't living healthily (and no amount of healthcare can make up for that.)

  7. One more point: poverty by Bombula · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Mod parent up.

    Spot on, poster. One point you missed though: despite the long hours and few vacation days in the US, there are more Americans in poverty now in real terms than at any time since the Great Depression. For tens of millions of Americans, despite all the work they are still dirt poor. This is for several reasons:

    - Minimum wage is not tied to any meaningful cost of living index.

    - The official 'Poverty Line' is similarly not based on any meaningful cost of living index (it is uselessly taken as 3 times the cost of food; food is dramatically cheaper now than even 25 years ago, and much less healthy, so this metric is positively retarded).

    - Rent on property has gone sky high as the economy has grown, meaning the cost of even the crappiest housing is essentially unaffordable for a minimum wage worker.

    And lastly, Employers are becoming increasingly exploitative, harkening back to 19th Century labor practices. Labor is less organized now and unions are weaker (where is a Wal Mart workers union for their 900,000 employees?). With so-called 'unskilled' jobs, employers encourage high turnover so they don't have to give pay increases with all sorts of draconian practices.

    On this last point, culpability falls largely on the government. Without regulation, unbridled capitalism is taken America steadily in the direction of Asian sweatshops. Supply and demand in the labor market defies all textbook economic logic because workers have no time to shop around for the best jobs, or to switch jobs when a better one becomes available and because they have no access to information about what other jobs might be available. Sure, you might get a dollar an hour more somewhere else, but if they withhold the first weeks' pay there, you can never switch because you won't ever be able to pay the rent or buy food if you miss a week's wages. Millions of people are that close to the edge. And so without rules - without government regulation - keeping companies from fucking low-wage workers, guess what? Those workers get fucked.

    So the point you missed is that millions of Americans are in a state of profound poverty. Sure, the US has pretty good general public infrastructure - roads, water, electricity - so it doesn't seem like poor people are living in the same poverty and desperation that exists in places like India, but in many instances they are. The toll on a person's health from the stress of poverty alone probably outweighs the toll of long working hours and few vacations. Bill Gates works 80-hour weeks, so I hear. He probably doesn't have the kind of stress-related health problems that a single mother holding down two jobs has, even if she only works a 60 hour week.

    Be sure to read Nickel and Dimed for more information about the impossibility of surviving in America on minimum wage.

    --
    A-Bomb
  8. you're complete wrong by idlake · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The truth is, there are only two markets in the US that consistently see greater than inflation price increases: medicine and education. Please note both markets are broken by government action.

    The US government-run health care institutions and programs are the most efficient in the nation, handily beating private health care systems in terms of cost, overhead, and at least equalling it in quality. And I believe if you looked into it, you'd find the same for education. Both health care and education have been broken by the market.

    I'm sorry, Adam Smith's invisible hand works almost everywhere, and frequently when it doesn't, it's failure is because of government, not big business

    Adam Smith's invisible hand has a long list of preconditions to work, preconditions on the numbers and sizes of competitors, on information available to competitors and buyers, on the kinds of goods being exchanged, etc. Claiming that it "works almost everywhere" is just completely wrong and demonstrates an utter unfamiliarity with economic principles.

    For health care and education, several of the preconditions are violated and therefore a free market approach doesn't work; the current failures of the US health care and educational system are a direct consequence of that (however, aspects of both health care and education can be left to the market--it just requires careful planning and design).

    The free market works wonderfully when its preconditions are satisfied. It's the purpose of our government to ensure that free markets exist in as many goods and services as possible. It is also the purpose of our government to ensure that the small subset of goods and services the free market cannot supply efficiently are provided in some other way.

    People like you, who have an irrational and factually wrong belief in the universal applicability of free market economics are at the source of a lot of our economic ills. It's adding insult to injury that after wrecking our health care and educational systems, you then turn around and blame the government for the mess you made through deregulation and privatization.