Boot Camp For Suckers?
DigitalDame2 writes "PC Magazine's Editor-in-Chief says the whole Mac/Windows dual-boot thing is really nothing to get excited about. He writes that Boot Camp is really just a plan to get Windows users to convert to OS X." From the article: "Once you've laid out a few kilobucks on your BC system and been frustrated a few times with Windows limitations, what are you going to do? Jobs's bet: You'll start spending more and more time in OS X, until you--too--become one of the pod people. It's sad to see so many of my compatriots being turned into lemmings. Perhaps they'll wake up and smell the Apple pie in the sky--and realize they've been taken for a ride. But I doubt it."
I'd rather have Apple pie than Windows pie. Ewww.. gross!
Ouch! The truth hurts!
Did anyone else read the headline "Boot Camp For Suckers?" and imagine that this was a camp run by Dogbert? I was ready to sign-up some coworkers.
You sir, have a mediocre grasp of the blindingly obvious!
I'm tempted to go into a lot more detail, but it would just weaken the message...
The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
Making John Dvorak look sane and reasonable since 1988.
I run two curious little game emulators. The first is called Mame and it permits me run a bunch of antique games once written for public coin-fed consoles. The second is called Boot camp and it permits me to run games on a kooky antique dollar-fed operating system. 537
Why would Steve care what switches you used with your Media Access Controller?
Well... I'm not British, but I've been declared an Honorary Brit for my grasp of irony. I'm also a professional editor and writer.
And this was just really poorly done. He has no control of tone at all. The "effete" crack in particular was icky (that's the technical term). Only an editor-in-chief could have published it, because anyone else would have been edited by someone who wasn't quite so in love with the thing. Just because it was intended to be satire, doesn't mean it was.
This is why most Americans are not allowed to have Sarcasm Licenses.
What I say does not represent the views of my employers, my friends, my cats, or myself.
How did Jim Louderback get the Editor-in-Chief position, anyway?
I don't understand your surprise. This is the same magazine that gainfully employs John C. Dvorak! =)
Javascript + Nintendo DSi = DSiCade
And the Dells come with a free forklift to carry them around! They're super-awesome!
Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
Step 1: Write about how Mac users are lemmings and get it posted to Slashdot Step 2: ????? Step 3: Profit!
The fact that Macs can now run windows is one of the main reasons that I'm considering buying a Mac. Oh no! I've been had...?
Dear me, I better get back onto my Mac-lemming-hating high-horse before it's too late!...
Daniel
Carpe Diem
real Mac user: someone true to who they are, the misfits, the rebels, the troublemakers, the round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently. They're not fond of rules and they have no respect for the status quo. The ones who are crazy enough to think that they can change the world.
So Stallman is a Mac user?
A funny post, but you've got a serious point. How the fuck did this article get itself posted to /. in the first place. Is someone on crack?
/. ........... hang on a minute i'm going to the toilet to take a dump. I'll be back in 10 minutes with a piece of paper that makes more sense than this shit. I'll make the front page no problem.
This is the worst written drivel I've ever had the displeasure of reading through
When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
For everyone who thinks the parent is too long, here's the executive summary: "I've never used a Mac. Ever."