One Big Bang, Or Many?
butterwise writes "From the Guardian Unlimited: 'The universe is at least 986 billion years older than physicists thought and is probably much older still, according to a radical new theory. The revolutionary study suggests that time did not begin with the big bang 14 billion years ago. This mammoth explosion which created all the matter we see around us, was just the most recent of many.'"
And you know how quickly that kind of thing can ruin your day!
"...at least 986 billion years older ..."
I always found it amusing when people take scientific estimates at face value. The article says something along the lines of "the universe could be up to a trillion years old," so, obviously, the universe is precisely 1 trillion years old.
In other news, pornography much older than originally thought.
Registered Linux user #421033
So...This is all just deja vu all over again?
Vista might be released before the next big bang.
sigpending(2)
Created the universe in one giant gang bang
** I hope I don't get smited for that
For some reason, when I conjugate the verb word "smite" in that context, I get "smut".
(Yes, I know, it should be "smitten", but that's hardly humorous.)
> parallel/oposite/mirror universe
Where people hang out on dotslash.moc, a web site for intellectually average people with magnificent sex lives. News for normals. You look mahvelous.
(-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.