Slashdot Mirror


Judges Challenge IP Wiretap Rules

WebHostingGuy writes to mention an MSNBC article on an appeals panel harshly challenging the Bush administration's wiretap policies. New rules from the FCC would make it easier for police and FBI agents to wiretap IP-based phone conversations. From the article: "At [one] point in the hearing, Edwards told the FCC's lawyer that his arguments were 'gobbledygook' and 'nonsense.' The court's decision was expected within several months. In an unrelated case last year affecting digital television, two of the same three judges determined the FCC had significantly exceeded its authority and threw out new government rules requiring anti-piracy devices in new video devices. Lewis was also the losing lawyer in that case, and Edwards also was impassioned then in his criticisms of the FCC."

13 of 82 comments (clear)

  1. Those poor judges. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They had so much to live for, but now they're all about to die soon in mysterious accidents. Let's hope the widows receive hams or something.

  2. Judge Edwards..... by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 4, Funny

    why do you hate America?

    --
    "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    1. Re:Judge Edwards..... by lucky130 · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...Commie!

      Oh wait, I mean...Terrorist! :)

  3. Actually, wait for ad hominem attacks on Edwards. by FatSean · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know, he's a damn activist judge who's putting pesky rights and fruity ideals in the way of keeping the nation safe for obese children and their fear-stricken parents.

    --
    Blar.
  4. Jon Stewart quote by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jon Stewart: Tonight, our focus is on Television! Today, the FCC wanted to impose the same decency standards that apply to broadcast television as they do to cable.
    [audience boos]
    Jon Stewart: To which many people said, "Uh, f*ck that guy!".

    (Yes, the "*" is added for irony.)

  5. Re:Actually, wait for ad hominem attacks on Edward by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
    From TFA:
    "There's nothing to suggest that in the statute," Edwards replied. "Stating that doesn't make it so."

    > Actually, wait for ad hominem attacks on Edward
    >
    >You know, he's a damn activist judge who's putting pesky rights and fruity ideals in the way of keeping the nation safe for obese children and their fear-stricken parents.

    Edwards oldthinker! Edwards unbellyfeel Amsoc! E

    (Slashdotter Tackhead know whichside buttertoast, is plusgood duckspeaker, learn duckspeak doubleplusfastwise in freedomcamp!)

  6. Re:You Are Not Getting My Beer! by Atomm · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh HELL!

    I can't put "less than" and 3 together?

    OK, fine....

    I HEART Judge Edwards!

  7. Re:You Are Not Getting My Beer! by ch-chuck · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sure you can: I <3 Judge Edwards!

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  8. Re:You Are Not Getting My Beer! by stinerman · · Score: 2, Funny

    For those of you wondering how he did that (and I know there's a lot of you out there):

    instead of '<', use:

    & lt;

    (minus the space)

  9. Re:You Are Not Getting My Beer! by Stradenko · · Score: 3, Funny

    Minus the space...bah!
    to get "&lt;" use "&amp;lt;" ... now there's no need to minus a space.

  10. The Founders by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Funny

    strike again!

  11. "Last name, Crane; first name, Denny." by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Edwards told the FCC's lawyer that his arguments were 'gobbledygook' and 'nonsense.'

    Not "jibberjabber" and "poopycock"?

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  12. Re:You Are Not Getting My Beer! by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 2, Funny

    And to get "&amp;amp;lt;" use "&amp;amp;amp;lt;"

    --
    <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>