Slashdot Mirror


Historic Microcomputer Restoration?

Pojodojo asks: "I am doing an independent study next semester with my computer science professor which we decided to call Historic Microcomputer Repair and Restoration. I will be working with such classics as the Altair 8080 and the Apple II. After I have repaired and or restored these machines, I will put them in a display for others to see. I have the opportunity for a modest budget to get equipment to put in the display, and would like to know is, what sort of things would you as fellow comp sci geeks like to see in a Historic Computer exhibit?"

31 of 170 comments (clear)

  1. Duh by baldass_newbie · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ascii pr0n, obviously.
    *sheesh*

    --
    The opposite of progress is congress
    1. Re:Duh by camusflage · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yah. Like you need to go to a museum to see it when you can just go here!

      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
  2. Porn. by Threni · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not kidding. I remember having a disk of porn for the BBC Micro. That computer only had 32k of ram, and the porn I had was for a mode that used about 5k..perhaps 10, something like that. It was animated too - two frames of it. Amusing.

  3. The abacus by luder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After all, it was one of the first calculating devices.

  4. well... by joe+155 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    .. I don't know the extent to which it fits your definition, but if I was to think of a bitchin' computer (insomuch as it could do some level of computing). It would be an Amiga 500, god I loved that... if you want something a little more in the line of "computer" I would say collosus, the original bletchly park beast... it could still out perform a P4....

    --
    *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    1. Re:well... by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You've got to love it that when a computer is so efficent that it's only limited by the speed at which data can be fed into it.

      When testing to see how fast the Colossus could perform reliably, engineers found that it would perform flawlessly until it was running so fast that the paper tapes that fed the input data into Colossus caught fire, at which point they abandoned the experiment for fear that they'd burn the wood-framed building down. A true testament to Turing and the other fine scientists at Bletchly Park.

      Pity Churchill ordered it destroyed after the war was over. It was decades ahead of its time.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    2. Re:well... by Boone^ · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You've got to love it that when a computer is so efficent that it's only limited by the speed at which data can be fed into it.

      Well, considering Moore's law doesn't apply to DRAM and Hard Disk Drives, I'd say almost all machines these days are thusly limited when given a problem set larger than its L3 cache.

  5. The Amiga 500 by scenestar · · Score: 4, Informative

    this thing is mroe important seeing as it was used for years for video editing.

    But who am I to judge.....

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
    1. Re:The Amiga 500 by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Amiga 1000 (the original Amiga) is the better historical computer, IMO. Hey - any movie used in The Price of Darkness has gotta have it goin' on!

      "I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! " ...
      "IN FACT...YOU WILL NOT BE SAVED!"

      Classic.

      Definitely the computer Matthew Broderick used in WarGames (IMSAI?) should be in there.

      Scrounging up a working Apple Lisa and Apple /// would be good, same for a Kaypro and an Osborne. All the classic 8-bits: Atari 400 and 800, Commodore PET, Commodore 64 (and weird ones like the SX64, etc.), TI-99 4/a, and if you have an Amiga, you can't skimp at avoid the Atari ST line. Coleco Adam.

      There's actually a little museum of this type here in Seattle in the SODO area Re-PC store. Some really awesome stuff, though the machines are all turned off. It'd be more fun if you could mess with them. There are actually working older computers for sale there pretty often, such as Apple //gs, etc. I'm sure glad I didn't buy that piece of shit, and went for an Amiga 500 at the time. *whew*

    2. Re:The Amiga 500 by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe there was an external genlock for the Amiga 500. However, the Amiga 2000 was by far the more popular platform for business use, with or without the toaster. I used to have an A2000 with the internal genlock (used the video slot, same place the toaster taps into for video, while it also goes into a normal slot) and the only thing I ever used it for was to chat over television (output from my vcr, which has a tuner of course) but it was pretty spiffy and fairly decent-quality.

      A friend of mine always wanted someone to ask him to hack a video toaster onto an Amiga 500, but no one ever did. He thought he could do it, based on the schematics of both systems, which were thoughtfully included with 'em.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. Variety of platforms by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    There was an amazing variety of 8-bit platforms manufactured between 1976-1985, the more you have the better. But take my advice, having refurbished a number of these machines: Plan on buying 3 for every one you get working, Ebay is your friend, no single machine is worth more than $5. You should be able to pick up core cpu/keyboards for $15 following these rules. Use a modern audio cable switch box and a single composite monitor to switch between them- Composite monitors are hard to find and expensive, but many modern cheap 15" TV sets have the correct RCA inputs.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Variety of platforms by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Depends on how you look at it- 1976-1979 certainly had the big names come in (Commodore Pet, Vic 20 & 64; TI-99/4 and /4a, Apple I, II, II+, IIe, Altair, the Tandy Radio Shack series, and of course, who can forget the precursor to the BBC micro, the Timex Sinclair Z80?), all of which were TECHNICAL leaps forward. But the real explosion came in with the merging of the Home Video Game Industry with the Home Computer industry: Coleco Adam; Atari 400, 800, 1600. And of course the business machines from IBM and Compaq both came out in 1980, as did a variety of "luggable" CPM machines. Plastic boxes in department stores were the start of the real Home Computer and Personal Computer, as opposed to the Micro Computer for hobbyists and businesses that could afford the expense and schools.

      But certainly, I'd cut it off at about 1986 or so- almost everything since then has been Windows, Mac, or Linux, the choice in platforms as far as hardware is concerned is almost dead.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  7. I think your best bet... by Bin_jammin · · Score: 4, Informative

    is to stick with well documented hardware. The two you've picked so far ought to more than fit the bill, but considering you've added "repair" to the title of the class, I assume you'll be doing pcb level hardware repair. This is a LOT of fun and frustration at the same time, but if you start digging into machines that nobody's thought of, cared about, or kept track of over the past 30+ years you probably will start getting into headaches of trying to diagnose some seriously weird bugs. Not to discourage you from this course of action, in fact far from it, it sounds like something I would have enjoyed in my public schooling days (or at least getting credit for it). Find clubs that support the machines and can give you advice, don't try to go it alone, after all, the machines were built by teams, teams should help you rebuild them. Most of all remember to have fun!

  8. Computer History Museum by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you haven't already done so, you and your professor need to contact the Computer History Museum in San Jose.

    Next week's big festivities involve a restored PDP-1.

    Their collection of hardware is pretty much unmatched, and is open to the public. What's on display is the tip of their collection's iceberg. Who knows what might be kicking around in the background, just waiting for a small team of geeks to restore?

    And conversely, who knows what might be kicking around in your classmates' basements that's on CHM's wish list?

  9. so many milestones... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's some computers I'd recommend you try to get. Each represents one or more milestones to what we now consider commonplace. (I've left out some of the more obvious ones; please forgive me if I've named some you consider obvious.)

    Desktops:
    Commodore PET 2001 (color chicklet keyboard).
    Sinclair ZX-80/81.
    Coleco Adam.
    DEC Rainbow 100.
    Amiga 2000.

    Portables:
    TRS-80 Model 100/102.
    Osborne 1.
    Compaq suitcase PC.
    HP 200LX.
    Apple Newton.
    Toshiba T1000.

    1. Re:so many milestones... by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Atari 400/800/XL series. One of the first computers to feature separate programmable chips for CPU, I/O, sound and graphics, and much more sophisticated multi-mode interrupt-driven video than either of its 6502 peers, the Apple ][ and the C64. The first digitized video I was on was connected to an 800 and the first computer playback of music I ever heard came from it (10 scratchy seconds of "You Really Got Me" by Van Halen).

      Remarkably hackable OS for ROM firmware. Arguably the truest random number generator (derived from multiple hardware sources like timing and voltages rather than a seed). G:, the Epson-compatible graphics printer device. And a level of hardware incompatibility that paved the way for the first Macintosh.

      --
      "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
  10. How about... by EnigmaticSource · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A DEC PDP-11/73, my personal favorite.

    Probably the easiest computer to rebuild from the classic era as there is only one bus (Unibus), and nothing but traces and some very simple electronics on the backplane. Well that and you could hit them with a hammer.

    The PDP-11 series, along with the PDP-8's were some of the first nodes on the ARPANET and you can still get working Ethernet adapters for them.

    Hell, I still miss mine (Viper tape drive, RSX/11, RSTS/E 10, BASIC Plus2, 512MB EDSI drive).

    (You can still find these things running if you look hard enough... (Try asking old medical/dental offices, most of them ran PDP/11's))

    --
    The Geek in Black
    I know my BCD's (when I'm Sober)
  11. Old school Unix... by Otter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There were people bragging about running these at home in the "How Pointlessly Excessive Is Your Home Network?" Ask Slashdot, but -- I'd be curious to play with a PDP-11 running circa-1970 Unix.

    And a Xerox Star.

  12. cardiac by MrRobahtsu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously.

    You haven't really lived until you've run a multiplication (by repetitive addition) manually on a cardboard computer simulator.

  13. If you consider an Apple II "historic"... by nutsy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... then you should try to get your hands on a KIM-1, the original testbed for the 6502 CPU. A mid-1970s kit built around Chuck Peddle's baby... now that's historic!

  14. Re:Really old stuff by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If he were a really old geek he'd have mentioned that he and Ada Lovelace used to sip tea whilst bragging about staying awake until the sun came up weaving towels out of nothing but some thread and the quadratic formula.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  15. Things I've seen that amuse people.. by technos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a fair amount of, shall we say, junk.

    The stuff that amuses folks the most?

    Hand modified "rev b" boards.. Every major manufacturer had em. So thick with a spiders web of enamelled wire patching flaws you were amazed they functioned.

    Drive platters. I have a few the size of small car tires. People always get wowed when I explain they hold far less data than a floppy disc.

    Memory boards. I have a Hewlett Packard board that holds 128 megabytes of memory. At 18x12x2 and a couple pounds, setting it next to a DRAM chip stripped from a modern DIMM usually elicits a 'WHOA'.

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
  16. I hate it when by wjeff · · Score: 2, Funny

    People start talking about "historic" computers, and I look around and see I have most the ones they mention still plugged in and running on various tables in my home office.

    It makes me feel old.

    --
    my old sig is obsolete, and I haven't come up with a stupid enough new one yet
  17. Try something less typical. by soward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I feel like the altair / apple / C= stuff has all been done over many times....
    Someone mentioned the sinclair, that might be interesting, especially if you could find one of the color ones. PDPs and the like fall in with one of my favorites, the Pr1me, as being mini-computers.

    How about an Alpha-Micro? It dates to about 1982, so while not _super_ old, it's no spring chicken. The company still exisits in some form, so you might be able to get docs, schematics, etc. And that whole 'write your backups to a VHS tape' trick still raises eyebrows today.

    --
    John Soward...University of Kentucky
  18. Next by wandazulu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would argue a NeXT computer should be part of any display, only because you can show it to people familar with MacOS X and then tell them that this machine has been around since *1990*.

  19. The LINC speed control... by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not sure whether this can be easily retrofitted into other computer designs, but one of the coolest things on the LINC--sometimes billed as "the first personal computer"--was the adjustable speed.

    The LINC had a pair of dials on it: one was a (continuous) potentiometer, like a volume control, the other was a four-position "decade" switch. The pair of dials joint produced a signal that could be used to make any of a number of front-panel functions auto-repeat at a variable rate. In particular, you could make the "single-step" function auto-repeat. The pot adjusted the repeat rate continously over about a ten-to-one range. Each switch position was a factor of ten faster than the last. The slowest speed was about two per second.

    This means that you could make the LINC single-step through its programs at an rate from about 2 to 200,000 steps per second... the later being about half of its full speed.

    So, you could take a program... run it at 2 steps per second and watch the lights flash... then gradually speed it up over a five decades to 200,000 steps per second. At 2 steps per second if you watched closely from time to time you'd see one dot on the screen flash momentarily. As you sped it up the, the flashes would occur more rapidly... then you could see it was forming characters... then lines of text appearing at about the speed of a dot matrix printer... then finally a whole screen of flicker-free text.

    Meanwhile, the LINC's speaker, attached to bit 6 of the accumulator, would gradually change from ticks to a buzzes to beeps.

    I never saw anything that gave you such a feeling for just how incredibly goddam fast a computer was. Even one running at about 0.5 megahertz clock rate.

    You actually could build a LINC from scratch, I suppose, since it was discrete components and the design was public domain. But it would be equally interesting to take a "stock" computer of almost any vintage and give it a continuously variable clock, a la the LINC.

  20. Re:Really old stuff by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Informative

    "you could get a version of MS-DOS that would run on these beasts."
    No you couldn't.
    Not unless there was an 8088 or 8086 card you could put in them. I guess it is possible such a beast was sold but they would have been rare.
    You could get CP/M for them and maybe ZPCR. I also remember a OS called LDOS I think was available as well.
    Now the Model 16 could run Xenix which was very cool.
    The first computer that Tandy made that ran MS-DOS I think was the Model 2000. It was better than the IBM CP but it wasn't PC compatible and failed in the marketplace.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  21. Re:relay computer by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I built something like that while in high school, which really dates me.

  22. Better yet, create a troubleshooting repair guide by JoeCommodore · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've got many emails over the years on asking verious questions on repairing old PETs (I have a couple simple fixes like check the sockets, clean contacts etc. but I'm not a hardware guy). The popular classic computers like the Atari 800, Apple II, VIC, C64, etc. have some really nice troubleshooting cheatsheets and guides, usually with text like 'if this is the symptom, check and/or replace these items..' Unfortuantely for the less popular machines (PET, Coleco Adam, etc, etc) there are no or very few guides.

    If you did your repairs and also worked up some rudimentary troubleshooting guide (or better set up a Wiki) for others I think you would be doing a bigger service to the classic computer communtity than just some me-too restorations.

    If you want a challenge for a restoration I would go and get a classic system restored and running, then gather a bunch of choice apps for the system and code up some easy front end (on that system or use a virtual drive, something friendlier) to demonstrate the actual programs in an "exhibit environment" (easy reset/reload, nice menu, etc.), a computer that successfully lights READY. is one thing, but one that also presents a menu of some of the popular games or programs of the time to experience is something way better.

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  23. Re:Outperform a P4?! What an absurd notion. by hcdejong · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The claim probably comes from this incident:
    (quote)
    A simulation of Colossus which Sale ran on a top-of-the-range Pentium PC took twice as long as the real thing.

    or this:
    If you wanted to program a modern computer to do what Colossus does, you'd need a 2GHz Pentium to match it.

    Don't forget Colossus was massively parallel:
    At 5,000 cps the interval between sprocket holes is 200 microsecs. In this time Colossus will do up to 100 Boolean calculations simultaneously on each of the five tape channels and across a five character matrix.

  24. If you're in the northeast US..... by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2, Informative

    You might want to contact MARCH, The Mid-Atlantic Retro Computer Hobbyist group. They've only been around for a very short time, but they're gathering a lot of informative members. They are running an exhibit this weekend (May 13) in Wall, NJ. Their website is still just basic info, but they have a discussion forum on Yahoo as linked on their main page.