Slashdot Mirror


Miniature Tags Track Dragonflies

celardore writes "BBC News reports about the epic journeys taken by dragonflies searching for warmer climates have been revealed by scientists in the US. The team, led by researchers from Princeton University, found that the insects are capable of flying up to 85 miles (137 km) in a day. Each transmitter weighed about a third of a gram and had enough battery life to track an individual for 10 days; but tagging such small creatures is far from easy. "The challenge is first catching the dragonfly," said Professor Wilcove. Once caught, each transmitter was attached with a couple of drops of superglue and some eye-lash adhesive."

6 of 32 comments (clear)

  1. A similar experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The same transmitters attached to mosquitos lead to a surprising result: each tagged mosquito stayed in the exact same meter squared for all 10 days of the experiment. Scientists are baffled because previous theories postulated that mosquitos were able to travel much longer distances.

  2. Was I in Dragonfly Heaven? by Quirk · · Score: 4, Interesting
    On a bicycle trip from Victoria, B.C. to Montreal, Que. I stopped near a small lake in Ontario. The lake was a few hundred yards off the highway. There were no cabins at the near shore off the road and the terrain dropped quickly down 40 or 50 feet at the lake edge to the lake surface.

    As I began setting up camp late in the afternoon I began to notice first a couple then dozens of giant neon blue and black dragonflies. After I had set up camp I walked a bit closer to the rock bluff above the lake and sat down. There were untold numbers of dragonflies all around me. Most were quite large but there were also smaller ones. After I settled on an outcropping of Canadian Sheild the dragonflies began to settle on rock and plants everywhere. I sat still and watched what was a surreal dance of hovering and slow moving dragonflies move lazily in the late afternoon summer heat.

    Needless to say there wasn't a mosquito to be seen or heard. I'd never before seen so many dargonflies and haven't since. Perhaps it was a hatching site, but the numbers were unestimatable. It was more a work of imagination than reality.

    Anyone had a similar experience?

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
    1. Re:Was I in Dragonfly Heaven? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sadly, 1/3 of (known) dragonfly species are listed as threatened or endangered on the IUCN Red List of endangered species.

      Life that relies on small ponds (rather then larger bodies of water) tends to be quite sensitive to insecticides & pesticides. I suspect the pond you're talking about was nowhere near any orchards (or other commercial farming).

      I'ts important to remember that nearly all ponds used to be like the one you're talking about - and could be again, if we just started being a little more sensitive.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  3. One doubt left by Nuffsaid · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder how far these insects can fly when not burdened with an electronic tag. Or a coconut. African dragonflies, I mean.

    --
    Nuffsaid
    ________

    Don't know about his cat, but Schroedinger is definitely dead.
  4. Scientist were even more baffled by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Funny
    When they learned that insects wich fly over tarmac can reach speeds of up to 120km/h but tend to do a lot of travelling between cities 5 days a week and take a trip to the beach on weekends. This leads them conclude that tarmac helps dragonflys achieve great speed. As further evidenced by insects flying near the great stretches of tarmac around airports can fly up to and over the speed of sound.

    Science. Love it.

    Still, 1/3 of a gram transmitter. That 100 gram cellphone ain't all that hot now is it.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  5. Re:Good use for tags by mangu · · Score: 2, Interesting
    litter the landscape with cheap sensors and cameras.


    I think that's inevitable. We already have millions of cameras controlling traffic. They have started with OCR for automatic reading of car license plates which reportedly works in real time. Next step will be face recognition software, I guess in the next ten years that will be very easy.


    No more privacy in public places, which, despite being an oxymoron, we have come to take for granted in big cities. Well, I guess it's not so bad, anyone who grew up in a small village, like I did, is used to the notion that everybody knows where you went and what you did in the street.


    I think there is something much worse than surveillance cameras everwhere, it's surveillance cameras controlled by public authorities. What I fear most is not having my picture taken, I fear having my picture under control of a faceless person somewhere who responds to an unknown agency. If all the surveillance cameras were accessible by anyone at anytime and all the archived images were made public, I could accept that. Under such a system there would be accountability by the authorities. I would be able to demonstrate that my image had been manipulated, if I needed to. And I would also be able to track the politicians and their agents, I would have an equal footing to protect myself.


    Isaac Asimov in 1957 wrote a short story about a world without privacy, "The Dead Past". In that story, there existed a technology to view the past, called "chronoscopy", which was under strict control by the government. The hero, a professor of history, was frustrated because he could never get to use chronoscopy in his work, so he contacted a physics researcher to do illegally some independent research on chronoscopy. The physics guy manages to recreate the chronoscopy theory and they publish the schematics for a chronoscope, today we would say they "open-sourced" it.


    In the end, it turns out that the chronoscope was useless for history research, because it couldn't reach back into the past further than a week or so. But it was perfect for seeing anything that happened in the world in the very recent past. That's why it was so strictly controlled. If you see anything in the last millisecond, are you seeing the past or the present? The story ends with the government agent who went to arrest them saying, "Happy goldfish to you, to me, to everyone, and may each of you fry in hell forever. Arrest rescinded".