Slashdot Mirror


Clocking the Movements of Atoms

Roland Piquepaille writes "With special microscopes, scientists and engineers involved in nanotechnologies have been able to 'see' atoms for a while. But they couldn't clock the atomic response to events which typically occur in nanoseconds. Now, U.S. physicists have found a way to clock the movements of atoms at the nanometer scale. In their experiments, they were able to literally watch atoms switching positions in ferroelectric materials. Adding the dimension of time to the observation of the nanoworld could lead to easier developments of 'materials for improved memory applications in microelectronics.'"

12 of 86 comments (clear)

  1. I figured it out faster by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 5, Funny

    "In their experiments, they were able to literally watch atoms switching positions in ferroelectric materials."

    I'd have just unplugged all the atoms, and when plugged in again, they'd all start counting from 12:00

  2. At long last... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess they'll finally be able to see the microscopic chance of the average Slashdot reader getting laid.

    1. Re:At long last... by Holi · · Score: 2, Funny

      sweet, another way that I'm not the average slashdotter.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  3. Basic stages by i_should_be_working · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now, I'm never one to complain about the decisions of /. editors (and I'm not here either), but it's pretty funny seeing this in the hardware sections.

    Maybe Ars Technica will have a review later...

    TFA? Yeah, it's worth reading. It's pretty cool the toys these guys (physicists in general) get to play with.

  4. How fast are these things moving, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    How fast is one nanometer per nanosecond, in meters per second? I don't have my calculator with me.

  5. Re:He fooled you! - sorta by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're right, he fooled me, I didn't see he was joking. I just assumed he was American, or worked at NASA so he didn't know metric.

    1,000,000,000/1,000,000,000 of course = 1/1 but not everyknow would know that a nanosecond is a billionth of a second.

  6. Phew! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    they were able to literally watch atoms switching positions in ferroelectric materials

    For a second there, I assumed that they'd built a microsope that could only figuratively watch things. Good job you pointed out that it literally works!

  7. Clocking is good, but by presidentbeef · · Score: 3, Funny

    What about overclocking those babies?! Whooo!

    No longer will atoms be bogged down at the n00b 'factory-spec' speed of light.

    Now to find the multiplier...

    --
    Everything I need to know about copyrights I learned from Slashdot.
  8. Finally, some much-needed police funding by noidentity · · Score: 3, Funny

    This opens a new source of funding from speeding atoms:

    COPper atom: Do you know how fast you were going?
    Helium atom (in a high voice): Not at all, officer!

    1. Re:Finally, some much-needed police funding by AoT · · Score: 3, Funny

      Helium atom: But I know where I am!

  9. Re:Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle by shadwstalkr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe.

  10. Re:Snore... by grammar+fascist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wake me up when we're OVERclocking atoms.

    I boiled some water yesterday.

    --
    I got my Linux laptop at System76.