Slashdot Mirror


Recipe for Making Symetrical Holes in Water

scottZed writes "Danish researchers found a simple way to make curiously shaped air holes in a bucket of water. Simply rig the bucket to have a spinning plate at the bottom, and depending on the speed, you can get an ellipse, three-sided star, square, pentagon, or hexagon. The effect may help explain such shapes seen in atmospheric disturbances on Earth and other planets. One practical use: really trippy washing machines."

34 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. Sloppy reporting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    TFA:
    Bizarre geometric shapes that appear at the centre of swirling vortices in planetary atmospheres might be explained by a simple experiment with a bucket of water.
    The bucket explains nothing - it might replcicate atmospheric conditions to the point where it will be a good model to aid in understanding atmosphereic conditions.

    This from a publication with the byline "the best in science journalism"

    Bah!
    1. Re:Sloppy reporting. by MrShaggy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Quoted from the article .." These natural structures have never been fully explained. Could they be produced by the effect observed by the Danish team? "I expect that similar conditions might apply in these atmospheric flows," says Bohr. But he admits that at this stage he doesn't understand the pattern-forming process well enough to be sure of the comparison.

      Swinney, meanwhile, thinks that the process is unlikely to apply to large-scale flows such as that on Saturn, but might be relevant to smaller-scale phenomena such as tornadoes."

      Seems that they realize that this is but baby steps, and there needs to be much more work done.

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    2. Re:Sloppy reporting. by finity · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've never considered /. "the best in science journalism," and think you should think hard about life, the universe and everything if you do. It's more like a club where everyone is invited to throw shit at a wall and everyone can see it. Sometimes it's good shit, and sometimes it stinks. This is interesting shit, multicolored maybe...

    3. Re:Sloppy reporting. by msparshatt · · Score: 2, Informative
      I've never considered /. "the best in science journalism," and think you should think hard about life, the universe and everything if you do.
      The GP was referring to Nature magazine, which does describe itself as "the best in science journalism"
    4. Re:Sloppy reporting. by i_should_be_working · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's how you decipher something that makes it an explanation.

      Einstein's equations of general relativity don't really explain anything unless you understand the math. To anyone else, they're just kooky looking symbols. To many people these may just be buckets with spinning water in them. To these researchers they may turn out to be explanations.

    5. Re:Sloppy reporting. by m0nstr42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Seems that they realize that this is but baby steps, and there needs to be much more work done.

      Amen. I'm getting sick of people reading a /. summary of a summary of someone's legitimate results and deciding then and there that the original research (whose message is now 2x re-interpreted by the successive authors) is crap. These people do this for a living; many hold tenure positions at prestigious research institutions that are reserved for the brightest in their fields. Most of their really significant results appear in peer-reviewed publications. They're probably slightly more qualified to decide what is significant in their fields than you are.

      Popular media tends to mangle the crap out of stories in an effort to make it accessible to a wide variety of people. This is necessary for the sharing of information and the generation of public interest in scientific progress. If you're semi-intelligent and a particular story catches your eye, you should know enough to read between the lines a little bit. If you want to make any claims regarding validity, you need to find the original publications and make a slightly better assessment than a half-page web story can provide you with.

    6. Re:Sloppy reporting. by iamlucky13 · · Score: 3, Informative

      To expand on the parent, the effect is called "similitude." The Reynolds number is a dimensionless number that involves the velocity of flow, the size of any defining flow feature (like pipe diameter), and the viscosity of the fluid. These are the primary factors that effect how a fluid flow will act on a larger scale.

      Unfortunately, this sort of thing doesn't work very well on a small portion of a system. Instead, computational fluid dynamics involves breaking the flow up into discrete elements, figuring out what each element should be doing (typically according to the equations used on larger or simpler systems), then figuring out how that effects the element next to it. Then you do the whole thing over again with new initial conditions defined by how all the elements effected each other. Then you do it once more. Then you keep doing it over and over until the difference between subsequent iterations gets small enough to make you happy (assuming you didn't screw up and it diverges). The ability to do this with a computer definitely opened new gateways for engineering with fluids, but it's still only an approximation, and there are some effects they have trouble figuring out. I don't think anyone can really appreciate the difficulty of some of the common problems like long-term or highly accurate weather or climate predictions until they've tried to solve a finite element problem involving just 4 elements (especially if you have complicating factors like heat transfer). Then you look up at the sky and multiply the difficulty by several billion or so.

      A couple of my friends in school worked summer research projects with one of our physics professors looking at a related effect known as Stewartson layers (basically, the shear rate of a fluid isn't actually linear across a flow in which velocity changes with position, like we usually model it as...sometimes the flow forms in "sheets"). I don't know all the details, but like the effect in the article, this one isn't well understood.

    7. Re:Sloppy reporting. by Old+Wolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      It seems obvious to me that they meant "span" (the past tense of "spin"):

        http://www.usingenglish.com/reference/irregular-ve rbs/spin.html

  2. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Aliens obviously use the plate to transmit geometrical patterns in an effort to contact us. This proves it beyond all doubt.

    1. Re:Interesting by jginspace · · Score: 5, Funny

      Aliens obviously use the plate to transmit geometrical patterns in an effort to contact us.

      I doubt they'd resort to those means. I'm sure they know that Skype has just introduced free calls to land lines and mobiles in the US and Canada until the end of the year: http://www.skype.com/company/news/2006/skype_freec alling.html

  3. Just a resonance? by mangu · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Well, if you have waves in the bucket, and the circumference of the hole is a multiple of that wavelength, then it's very natural that this phenomenon should happen.


    I'm curious about the researcher's name, Tomas Bohr, any relation to Niels?

    1. Re:Just a resonance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thomas Bohr is the grandson of Niels Bohr.

      - AC

    2. Re:Just a resonance? by pheede · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, he's the grandson of Niels Bohr. His two cousins, Henrik and Jakob Bohr, are also professors at the Department of Physics at the Technical University of Denmark.

    3. Re:Just a resonance? by ZombieWomble · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Well, if you have waves in the bucket, and the circumference of the hole is a multiple of that wavelength, then it's very natural that this phenomenon should happen.

      In that situation, there would be perfect axial symmetry as these wavelengths would be identical in all directions, giving a fixed circular standing wave pattern once the flow stabilised (given a symmetric bucket, obviously). However, in this case, we have a breakdown in axial symmetry, and instead have slowly rotating geometric shapes instead.

    4. Re:Just a resonance? by binarybum · · Score: 4, Funny

      yes and don't forget that Ima Bohr, Whadda Bohr, and Yura Bohr all founded the Institute of Neutrino Generation - Commonly referred to as Bohr-ING.

      --
      ôó
  4. Interesting Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It looks like the end result of system resonance set up between the harmonics and the properties of water. It would be cool to artificially vary the viscosity of the water with polymers, or add salts to increase specific gravity to note the affect on the pattern properties. OK, some of you are thinking, this guy is a nut but it just proves how never ending the learning process is as it relates to even the simplest things observed in nature. I like it.

  5. TFSummary says "Three-sided star..." by Khyber · · Score: 5, Funny

    I say "Triangle"

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:TFSummary says "Three-sided star..." by tOaOMiB · · Score: 2, Informative

      Isn't a three-sided star the shape of a mercedes-benz logo? I guess they really meant three-pointed star...

    2. Re:TFSummary says "Three-sided star..." by Mr+Z · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a triangle just like a Y is a triangle.

  6. Practical by suv4x4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    One practical use: really trippy washing machines

    practical

    adj 1: concerned with actual use or practice; 2: guided by practical experience and observation rather than theory; 3: being actually such in almost every respect; 4: having or put to a practical purpose or use;

  7. Pedantic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    pedantic

    adj 1: Like a pedant, overly concerned with formal rules and trivial points of learning; 2: Being showy of one's knowledge, often in a boring manner; 3: Often used to describe a person who emphasizes their knowledge through the use of vocabulary; 4: Being finicky or picky with language.

    1. Re:Pedantic by suv4x4 · · Score: 5, Funny

      pedantic

      adj 1: Like a pedant, overly concerned with formal rules and trivial points of learning; 2: Being showy of one's knowledge, often in a boring manner; 3: Often used to describe a person who emphasizes their knowledge through the use of vocabulary; 4: Being finicky or picky with language.


      joke: n. 1. Something said or done to evoke laughter or amusement, especially an amusing story with a punch line. 2. A mischievous trick; a prank. 3. An amusing or ludicrous incident or situation.

    2. Re:Pedantic by earthbound+kid · · Score: 2, Funny

      pedantic

      adj 1: Like a pedant, overly concerned with formal rules and trivial points of learning; 2: Being showy of one's knowledge, often in a boring manner; 3: Often used to describe a person who emphasizes their knowledge through the use of vocabulary; 4: Being finicky or picky with language.

      joke: n. 1. Something said or done to evoke laughter or amusement, especially an amusing story with a punch line. 2. A mischievous trick; a prank. 3. An amusing or ludicrous incident or situation.


      recursion: n. Mathematics.
            1. An expression, such as a polynomial, each term of which is determined by application of a formula to preceding terms.
            2. A formula that generates the successive terms of a recursion.

  8. Re:Wow by fish+waffle · · Score: 4, Funny

    seriously, what if in the ocean the waterflow is spinning very hard itself under certain conditions, wouldn't that be a possible explanation for the disappearances in the Bermuda Triangle?

    Yes, that's right. A suitably airplane-shaped hole would indeed allow an airplane to fall to the bottom of the ocean without getting wet, nicely and logically accounting for its sudden and complete disappearance. Similarly, holes isomorphic to boats and drowning people would account for those inexplicable losses.

    Oh, wait, Bermuda triangle---you probably meant a triangular hole. No, sorry, that's just stupid.

  9. Re:Wow by Decaff · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But seriously, what if in the ocean the waterflow is spinning very hard itself under certain conditions, wouldn't that be a possible explanation for the disappearances in the Bermuda Triangle?

    You don't need an explanation for the disappearances in the Bermuda Triangle, at least no special explanation. The disappearances there occur at no greater frequency per unit of shipping or flight than anywhere else in the world.

  10. Re:Instability? by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    You're confusing randomness with chaos theory. Randomness is essentially us saying "We might know the principles at work, but it's too complicated for us to make an accurate prediction on what is exactly going to happen." Brownian motion is one such example. We have a good idea on the physics behind it, but the huge number of interactions that take place mean that we can only predict the behavior of the entire system, not of single particles in it. Furthermore, single particles do not show a propensity to do anything in particular. You won't find random particles moving in circles, for example.

    Chaos theory deals with systems where we can calculate effects on single objects in the system, and where these objects exhibit non-random patterns. You mentioned fractals already (although strictly speaking, that's defined as a complex system rather than a chaotic one), and population growth patterns are another.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  11. The most amazing information on this article by layer3switch · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Harry Swinney, a specialist in pattern-forming fluid flows at the University of Texas at Austin, says the new observation is roughly in line with what one might expect."

    Wahhh~? Specialist in pattern-forming fluid flows at University of Texas at Austin? Heck I hope Mr. Swinney's parents didn't flush their saving down the toilet on his college education... oops, I mean, symetrically pattern-forming spiral downward flowing. ...yeah... the technical term.

    --
    "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
  12. Re:Wow by Decaff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Frequency of disappearances is not enough to say that a special explanation is not needed. The question was not "Are there more disappearances in the Bermuda Triangle?" but, "Are the circumstances of disappearances in the Bermuda Triangle unusual?"

    It is the same question. If there are no more disapearances there, there is no need for any consideration of unusual circumstances. Unusual circumstances are only needed to explain unusual numbers of disapearances, and there aren't any. Looking for extraordinary explanations of ordinary statistics is unscientific and pointless.

    Also, while people keep saying there are statistics, I haven't seen them, nor are sources for the statistics cited.

    A good source of statistics is insurance payments for missing vessels: Lloyds of London claim no evidence of any special effect associated with the Bermuda Triangle area (if there were, ships would have to pay extra insurance to enter the area).

  13. Photos and video by Falkkin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some better photos can be found here, along with a video. Unfortunately the video seems to show the vortex from its side rather than the top. Pretty cool though!

    http://dcwww.camp.dtu.dk/~tbohr/RotatingPolygon/

  14. Re:A guess... Re:Sloppy reporting. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Funny
    Venturing a guess that the speed that the false bottom is rotating at is related to the velocity that a vibration propagates through water, and the shapes are the result of resonance with the 'corners' nodes, and the edges antinodes.

    Reminds me of an old joke:

    Q: How do you drive a Belgian nuts?
    A: You put him into a circular room, and tell him there are fries in the corner.

  15. Easy to explain by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What we're seeing are shapes caused by friction. As a moving fluid (liquid or gas) moves against something that is not moving, or is moving at a different speed, the friction causes waves just like those waves that surfer guys ride or the waves in the atmosphere caused by a wind blowing over a mountain.

    So why the different shapes? As the bucket speeds up, three things happen. There's a different speed differential between the bucket and the water, the water depth decreases and the extra g forces increase (effectively increasing local gravity). This changes the wavelength of the wave. So, since the bucket has a finite circumference and is circular, standing waves will form that go back to their own starting point which will make shapes of integer numbers of sides. (non integer numbers of sides will not form a standing wave).

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  16. Reminiscent of the work of Hans Jenny by DIGITAiLor · · Score: 2, Interesting


    This reminds me of the work of the Swiss doctor Hans Jenny in the 60s. Dr. Jenny sent audible simple sine waves through various media and photographed the patterns that would emerge.

    The results were often strikingly beautiful and symmetrical. His two books on the subject, full of high-quality imagery, were recently reprinted as one volume. He called his study of wave properties "cymatics."

    The photographs illustrate the multi-sensory aspect of all phenomena. Frequency and wavelength show their existence in many forms and media, all representing the same phenomena. You can string a violin bow over sand on glass and see some incredible webs of patterns emerge in the sand. It's amazing to think that both aural and visual feedback from the same source can be produced so simply. And, importantly to myself at least, have both be aesthetically pleasing.

    http://www.cymaticsource.com/ has the reprints of the books. I think they also relate it to a lot of more sketchy spiritual stuff that the good Dr. never mentioned AFAIK.

    In this case in TFA, the researchers have seen the amazingly symmetrical and simple visual representation of the interaction between fluid, vessel, and frequency (rotation). It does make sense that such a simple phenomenon (rotating fluid) would have a simple, fundamental visual pattern. I bet it looks a lot more interesting than it sounds though.

  17. Those people aren't "researchers"... by aws910 · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're stoners. whoaaaa....

  18. Re:Computing Speed? by NormalVisual · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sure you can - just look under /usr/src/linux-2.6.16/arch/h20 in your favorite distro.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas