Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Microsoft Introduces Pay-as-You-Go Computing

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the crash-as-you-go dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Geekzone is reporting that Microsoft is introducing a new business model for 'pay-as-you-go computing.' From the article: 'The pay-as-you-go computing model enabled by Microsoft's FlexGo technology allows customers to have a fully featured PC at home by paying only for the time as they use it through the purchase of prepaid activation cards or tokens. Microsoft has been running trials of the program in Brazil for more than a year and will soon be expanding to select markets in India, Russia, China and Mexico.'" This makes me giggle, because it's basically the return of time-sharing; in the past it was for for mainframe systems, but I suppose the same concept behind the mainframe idea would be true in developing countries today with PC systems.

9 of 328 comments (clear)

  1. Why? by Kranfer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does it seem Microsoft is running out of good ideas? Pay as you go computing? How long would it be before you actually pay the amount that a new PC/Windows would cost for this? Is Microsoft going to be the next Rent-a-Center, where you pay $5000 for a PC that costs $500? Or pay $1000 for windows when it is in reality $200? heh, bad idea I say.

    --
    -- Josh
    "Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me!" - Pete Conrad
    1. Re:Why? by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Considering that they want 1/3 up front, and that the software is now the greatest part of the expense of owning a box, it would be cheaper to take that 1/3 and buy a lower-spec white box and throw linux or bsd on it, and pocket the difference.

      After all, if they can't afford the box, they won't be able to afford the games and shite that require Windows either ...

      With the mney they save, they can buy a Wii for their gaming fix.

  2. This is just sub-prime financing by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's the same tactic used to lease-to-own cars to people who can't really afford them

    FTFA:

    1. An individual purchases a PC by making an initial payment equivalent to one-third of the total cost. A third party financial institution pays the retailer the remaining cost of the PC on the buyer's behalf.
    2. The buyer agrees to purchase 800 hours of time on their PC at a low hourly rate - they can add time as frequently or as infrequently as they choose and take as long as they need to purchase the hours. The cost of the 800 hours covers the re-payment to the financial institution (including interest).
    3. Hours of PC usage can be conveniently purchased over time through a variety of distribution channels, including convenience stores (scratch cards), ATMs, Point of Sale networks and the internet.
    4. Once 800 hours of usage time is purchased, no additional payments are required to use the PC.

    In other words, if you don't qualify for the loan as per item 1, you don't get to "long-ter lease" the box. So why not just borrow it outright and not be stuck paying per hour? Or take that 1/3 cash down and buy a used PC.

    1. Re:This is just sub-prime financing by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      FTFA: "Genuine Microsoft"

      So you're going to have to pay for the time you use to download and install all those patches, updating antiviruses, as well as the time your box is being p0wned and sending out spam, etc.

      Of course, if you can't afford to own your box, you can't afford a fast connection, so you're going to spend more overall just maintaining your box.

      For the 1/3 they want up front, buy a plain beige box outright and run a free os. After all, its not like these people are going to be able to afford to blow big bux on games or other software that runs only on windows.

  3. Won't work by stm2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the Microsoft page: "makes it easier for people with modest incomes in emerging markets to buy a full-featured PC for their families"

    The true is that "people with modest incomes in emerging markets" don't buy software. Even when buying a new computer, big retails shops bundle Linux, that is removed as soon as people see they can't play games or use Encarta or Word or any other well known software. On the newspapers in Argentina, you see there is a standard fee for "linux removing" (and Windows installing, not advertised). In small computers shops, they preinstall WindowsXP without even asking (without licence). Most software is available for u$2 on CD-R (is advertised on any newspaper and even phone booth).
    Only big companies (mostly from overseas) can afford to buy software.

    --
    DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
  4. Re:Giggle giggle by realnowhereman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It sounds like you aren't aware that time on mainframes was often leased in the past? Making the comparison reasonably valid.

    --
    Carpe Daemon
  5. Filthy by linvir · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This makes me sick to my stomach. The real geniuses of Microsoft, the ones working in the money dept, have come up with a way to drip feed the poor with an operating system they couldn't afford before (instead of choosing one they can afford), reinforce the idea that you're only renting access to software, and come up with a way to get more data on peoples' computer usage, all in one fell swoop.

    And cue the anti-Slashdot trolls bitching about how we see everything MS does as evil...

  6. So now you know... by geoff+lane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...why Microsoft is so dismissive of the $100 PC.

    1. Re:So now you know... by babbling · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Two projects: The Microsoft rent-a-computer project, and the $100 laptop project.

      One of these projects is attempting to empower the 3rd world, and the other project is attempting to enslave the 3rd world.

      Can you guess which is which?