130 Filesharer Homes Raided in Germany
Flo writes "Today, 130 homes have been raided in Germany under the allegation of filesharing. Law enforcement agencies had been monitoring an eDonkey-Server for two months. 3500 identified users are being investigated. Searches took place when users shared more than 500 files. Partners of the music industry helped identifying copyrighted material, but monitoring of the servers was solely done by law enforcement."
Law enforcement officials ARE running servers. I think this has been mentioned on Slashdot before... at least I think someone traced a server group to Sony or the RIAA or something.
It looks a lot of filesharing is going back to sneakernet like it was in the 1970's.
I wonder if they raided any homes with a wireless AP being leached by a neighbor. That could be fun when they can't find evidance.
The truth shall set you free!
This may seem rather archaic, but the IT department is so paranoid about getting in trouble with the **IA that they busted a 5-person DC++ network last year.
Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
Sometimes I wonder what will the MPAA/RIAA/GEMA/etc. do, when all file-sharers are locked up in prison, all music and film is DRM-restricted, CD sales are still declining and nobody goes to see blockbuster movies anymore...
I would mod you insightful if I had mod points. However:
Marijuana is legal in quite a few countries. It can happen.
I'm not American and I don't have that much insight about "the war on drugs", if it's good or bad. But some people (like me) are generally pro-filesharing and anti-drugs. To mix these two domains opens up the whole guilt-by-association-door. "See, fileshares think that marijuana should be legalised." But still, I agree with the spirit of your last sentence, anything can happen.
... Those crazy Europeans paid VAT taxes on all blank media because people just kind of assumed it would be used for piracy. (I hope thats not the real reason, I really, really do.)
Live according to the Categorical Imperative. If the Categorical Imperative tells you not to live by it... ignore it
The problem I see here and that most readers seem to be overlooking, is that the RIAA/music industry representatives "helped" the police to decide wether a user actually shared copyrighted content. So assume you you share, but only free/legal stuff. But you share a lot, so at first you are on their radar. Then some music industry rep searches through the stuff you shared to determine if it's legal or not. Assume he is wrong (on purpose or not). As a result, the police will break down your door with a search warrant, seize all your computers, CDs, and DVDs as evidence and it will take months for you to see them back. In the meantime, try to prove that you are innocent. Even if they eventually figure out that you are innocent, they have effectively scared you from using P2P sharing (regardless of legal content). That because the music industry isn't only hurt by the legal songs shared, they are hurt and afraid by the principle of P2P distribution, it fundamentally challenges not only their business model but their whole "raison d'etre". That's what is really outrageous about this action.
Idempotent operation: Like MS software, wether you run it once or often, that doesn't make it any better.
As I said, that is not clear. If a judge finds CSS to be an effective copy protection, then it would be indeed illegal to distribute tools supporting this circumvention. It would even be a criminal offense (up to 1 year in prison).
Because of this uncertainty many linux distributions do not include libdvdcss in Germany. But it is still possible and legal to install it right after installation using an online update site. Novell etc just don't want to get their linux packages seized in stores one day.
a) because politicians (who make and pass the laws) are financed by businesses. We only get to elect whoever has been financed by businesses first.
b) because destroying a corporation would also destroy a lot of tax revenue and livelihoods of many employees.
c) increasing the risk of "difficult" litigation to the businesses decreases the opportunity for successful businesses to appear.
It's not a perfect world, mate. And politcal corruption is the worst kind because it corrupts the topmost politicians.
In (loosely citated) words of Michael Moore (Fahrenheit 911) - when the business gives your president 100 millon dollars a year (in bribes) and your state budget just a few , then who's your daddy?
When you find the cure to corrupting power, please do let us know!