Looking for Life in Light
Gearoid_Murphy writes "Earth-like planets around distant stars may be too far away to be reached by spacecraft but scientists could still investigate whether they harbour life.
Telescope technologies are being developed that will probe the very faint light from these objects for tell-tale signs of biology.
These are the same "life markers" known to be present in light reflected off the Earth - so-called "earthshine"."
PS: funny part is, if they see our earthshine from the same distance, we humans wouldn't even exist. Talk about being stealthy :)
Of Code And Men
You're right, of course. We shouldn't be wasting our time with this head-in-the-clouds nonsense. Say, what's the latest news about Britney Spears' baby?
The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
SETI has that pesky 'I' there, meaning intelligence. It's looking for signs of radio communications, based on assumption that only intelligent beings might communicate with radio. Though if a non-intelligent life communicating with radio was found, I don't think anybody would be majorly disappointed ;-).
u rrent/lectures/first_billion_years/first_billion_y ears.html
TFA is talking about finding planets that have *any* life that can significantly change the atmosphere of a planet. Earth could have been discovered like this probably at least since we've had O2 (regular oxygen gas) and O3 (ozone) in our atmosphere, starting from about 2 billion years (*) ago. Contrast this time with the time we've used radio communications, less than 100 years.
(*) reference:
http://www.globalchange.umich.edu/globalchange1/c