Slashdot Mirror


Looking for Life in Light

Gearoid_Murphy writes "Earth-like planets around distant stars may be too far away to be reached by spacecraft but scientists could still investigate whether they harbour life. Telescope technologies are being developed that will probe the very faint light from these objects for tell-tale signs of biology. These are the same "life markers" known to be present in light reflected off the Earth - so-called "earthshine"."

4 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. Earthshine? Pah. by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Funny

    For some real signs of life, try a little moonshine.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Seems primitive. by jd · · Score: 4, Informative
    If/when the kilometer array is built (it's an array of small radio telescopes, where the array has a diameter of a kilometer and a density of one dish every couple off metters or so), they will be able to resolve Earth-sized planets at a distance of 100 light years.


    How will this help? Radio telescopes can look at the absorbtion spectrum of the planet for the tell-tale lines of water, methane, oxygen (both O2 and O3), and other markers of highly reactive chemicals - especially when they will react with each other. When you have an atmosphere that is chemically violently unstable (as is the case on Earth), it must be being maintained by some process.


    That's the first clue, but only the first. The second clue is that "dead" planets will be in equilibrium with their surroundings, but "living" planets will always be in opposition. (Organisms will always create a dynamic equilibrium that suits them, so must always counter any and all natural phenomena that would push the system away from that preferred state. Simple negative feedback.)


    Simple radio telescopes can do all this now, no new optical technology need be developed, and no assumptions about the type of life need be made. (All the above assumes is that life can never be inert and that any specific organism cannot function equally under all potential conditions. That's broad enough, although there will probably be exceptions even then.)


    The Km array proposed (and the hectare array already built) are just a huge stack of ordinary satellite TV dishes. This could be done by anyone at any time. A mile array would give you 2.5x2.5 pixels ast 100 lightyears - enough to discern if weather patterns exist, though not enough for any long-range forecasts.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  4. Why telescopes? by talkingpaperclip · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't understand why these guys are searching so hard for life in light. There have to be at least a dozen half-dead bugs in the ceiling light about 7 feet away from me.