Slashdot Mirror


Refund of Long-Distance Telephone Taxes

pertelote writes "Over 108 years after financing the Spanish American War, the tax on long-distance phone calls is finally being repealed. The IRS is supposed to refund our last three years worth of taxes for both landlines and cell phones on our returns next year. The phone companies sued because they did not want the hassle of collecting the tax. The tax is no longer in effect on 31 July, 2006." Don't get too excited about a big windfall. From the article: "Consumers, who pay about 40 percent of the taxes collected, typically pay about $18 a year in excise taxes if they have a long-distance service and a cellphone. They will be able to file for a refund on their 2006 federal income tax returns."

9 of 303 comments (clear)

  1. I have a better idea on how we can save money by MikeRT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't want a refund. I want my money to go toward funding the FBI teams that are going after Rep. Jefferson. I want them expanded by several hundred agents and to have what happened to Jefferson to happen to the entire Congress. You want to save money? Bush the sons of bitches who spend nearly $2B on bridges to nowhere, $1B on repairing and then moving a perfectly good railroad and all of that other pork barrel crap. Sorry, they can keep my $18/year in exchange for the FBI continuing to go after these scumbags. I'd consider that some of the best $18 I've ever spent.

    1. Re:I have a better idea on how we can save money by Atzanteol · · Score: 3, Insightful
      And being driven home by the police and being told "don't do it again" is hardly a serious investigation.

      Compared to what has been done to Rush Limbaugh for a similar problem (though he didn't nearly hit a police car) I'd say the Kennedy incident was nicely 'swept' under the rug. Like father like son...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    2. Re:I have a better idea on how we can save money by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The fact he spent millions on legal fees is punishment enough considering he already admitted himself to rehab. Yup, no good deed goes unpunished.

      Meanwhile, congressmen get a slap on the wrist and told "don't do that again".

      Talk about a total disconnect from the people and inside-the-beltway.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  2. Income Tax by mulhollandj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are they ever going to repeal income tax which was only supposed to be 2% max? Many of us pay over 50% in taxes if you include gas tax, sales tax, income tax, property tax, etc etc.

  3. there's no temproary tax or program by b17bmbr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    for those of here in California, you might remember the sales tax history. it was capped at 6% forever, then when the earthquake hit northern california in 1989, they allowed a "temporary" sales tax increase to help pay for it. Well, it's going on 17 years now and Los Angeles is 8.25% and isn't going down anytime soon. The same is true of spending. It only gets larger and grows, which is the source of our current economic problems and even longer term nightmare. I understand alot of the political sympathies around here, many at odds with mine (mostly foriegn policy related) but at least there'd be enough sentiment for small governemnt. big brother is big brother, whether he's listening to your phone calls OR taking half your paycheck.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    1. Re:there's no temproary tax or program by plague3106 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Personally I think ALL laws should have an expiration date. And each law must be voted on seperately.

      We have some pretty antiquated laws that should just die. You get the added benefit that Congress is too busy keeping murder laws on the books to introduce stupider laws!

  4. Why do we have to file? They have our records by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If they already have our phone records, couldn't they just analyze them to see who is elgible for the refund?

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  5. I read it differently... by maillemaker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >Bowing to changes in technology and pressure from taxpayers and phone companies

    The deeper significance here is that taxpayers don't mean squat but phone companies can get things done.

    I'm not surprised, I always knew dollars were stronger than votes. I just hate having my nose rubbed in it.

    Steve

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  6. Stop bashing taxation...be honest about their uses by NorseWarrior · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We all acknowledge that there is some waste in government....until it comes to the programs you like! Taxes do good things--they generally build roads to somewhere...they pay for schools...they pay for police, fire, and other stuff. In business, you get what you pay for. In business, waste takes on forms like Ken Lay or Jeff Skilling....and other overpaid CEOs. (and, oh yes--it was GOVERNMENT, in the form of prosecutors, not stockholders, who held them accountable.!) Guess what--the principle works the same in government. You get what you pay for. You don't like it--then get involved in the process and change it. This phone tax is a red herring....a right-wing fakeout to avoid the fallout over huge tax cuts to the rich which vastly overshadow the cost of this little sop to the masses. I say keep my $18. Give me good roads, and good schools. Hunt down the criminals. Feed kids who go to bed hungry. And yes--make those who benefit the most in our society bear the burden for taking care of the least among us.