Slashdot Mirror


EU Court Blocks Passenger Data Deal with U.S.

Reinier writes "The BBC reports that the European Court of Justice has ruled the airline data agreement with the United States is illegal. The 'agreement' required airlines to share 34 items of personal data of their passengers with American authorities at least fifteen minutes before take-off of any flight to the US. The Court of Justice examined the agreement after the European Parliament objected. A PDF of the ruling is available online."

5 of 572 comments (clear)

  1. Interesting... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does anyone think that US will start banning flights or threaten to remove financial aid if the data isn't shared? Would a European country give in to the US or obey the court ruling?

    I think this is going to be a sticky mess since the rule of law isn't being respected in the US now and US attitudes towards foreign courts has always been "screw you, mate!"

  2. Difficult position for airlines by debest · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "If we don't supply the information to the United States authorities then we're liable to fines of up to $6,000 per passenger and the loss of landing rights," he said.

    "And if we do supply the data, potentially we're breaking the law [on data protection]."


    So what are their options? Are the airlines going to have to completely suspend flights to the United States if neither side backs down?

    (Not that this possibility isn't intriguing, but I certainly wouldn't want to have to be a manager in one the major European carriers for the next few months).

    --
    Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
  3. Visas? by Alfred,+Lord+Tennyso · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Could the US simply refuse visas to anybody who will not provide them that information?

    And could they turn away a plane carrying somebody without a visa?

    In general EU citizens get their visas in customs, after having landed in the US, and US citizens get the same treatment in the EU. That's always struck me as odd, actually; what if they refuse you a visa? You've flown all that way for nothing?

    I wonder if they need to move the visa procedures back closer to the country of origin. That would probably be a massive regulatory hassle. And it would sure make relations between the US and the EU seem chillier.

  4. Re:So, has anyone ever ... by PinkPanther · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The one exception seems to be alcohol.
    Alcohol being "banned" is also questionable in Islam.

    Islam preaches about moderation. Anything in abundance is bad, including prayer if it interfers with the general principles of being a good Muslim (e.g. prayer to the exclusion of being an active member of society or devotion to the point of obsession).

    Though I have seen passages from the Qu'ran stating that alcohol (or "intoxicants" or "fermented fruits") are banned, I strongly question that stance. Many of these passages, as with other religion documents around the world, are taken out of context and/or questionably translated.

    Islam does not contain many absolutes in its philosophy (don't confuse philosophy with practice and culture)...it is a religion of reason and its primary messages are of love, peace, family, society and living a life of moderation.

    Yes, you can find many (MANY) webpages stating that there are fundamental truths in Islam and its practice including the "Haram" of alcohol...and I can find a number of sites that state that women have no voice, that "infidels" are anyone who disagrees with some sect's interpretations, yada-yada-yada.

    At its root, Islam asks that each individual Muslim question for themselves the essence of their faith and the meaning of its philosophy. Blindly accepting rules and "facts" set out by others does not make one a "good Muslim".

    --
    It's a simple matter of complex programming.
  5. Re:Directive & Articles by Gadzinka · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But you see... European data protection laws explicitelly state, that consent to give away data protection cannot be condition to any contract and items of contracts containing such provisions are void.

    This is a big difference between US and EU laws. In both organisms state reserves the oversight of contracts between private citizens and corporations. But while in US government backs away from such oversight in any matter that any wacko might label "anti-business", in EU there are lots of laws, that state that some provisions in them cannot be discarded by contracts, and items of contracts contradicting such provisions are illegal and void.

    I actually like my state protecting me from monopolies/cartels.

    Robert

    --
    Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162