Slashdot Mirror


High Court Trims Whistleblower Rights

iminplaya writes "In yet another blow against free speech rights, the Supreme Court decided that government employees who report wrongdoing do not enjoy 1st Amendment rights while on the job. From the article 'The Supreme Court scaled back protections for government workers who blow the whistle on official misconduct Tuesday, a 5-4 decision in which new Justice Samuel Alito cast the deciding vote [...] The ruling was perhaps the clearest sign yet of the Supreme Court's shift with the departure of moderate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and the arrival of Alito. [...] Stephen Kohn, chairman of the National Whistleblower Center, said: "The ruling is a victory for every crooked politician in the United States."'"

1 of 718 comments (clear)

  1. Drop the FUD; Read the Opinion by fortinbras47 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The following two points are NOT controversial:
    (1) A private employee's statements to his employer are not protected by the First Amendment. (If you go on TV and call your boss an asshole, he can fire you and you are NOT protected by the first amendment.)

    (2) The government CANNOT stop citizens from bringing up issues in the public interest.

    Which brings us to this case...
    The majority of the court simply said that in this case, the petitioner was acting in his official duties and falls in category (1) and not category (2). Federal whistleblower laws etc... might protect him, but he has no CONSITUTIONAL right of action under the First Amendment.

    Before you go crazy and mod me down, take a moment to read the opinion. IMHO it's a quite reasonable outcome.