Slashdot Mirror
Blu-Ray Should Have Been Optional on PS3?
Ars Technica has a piece looking at reasons why Sony may have wanted to make the Blu-Ray player optional in their next-gen console. From the article: "By tying what is essentially a gaming device to a new optical disc format, Sony is hoping to kill two birds with one stone, but they're expecting consumers to pay for the stone as if it were a diamond. That is, in hoping that consumers will see the Blu-ray player as a good investment in the future, they're risking the fallout that comes when consumers realize that diamonds aren't investments at all. They're for show. And the way the PS3 is priced right now, bling appears to be the operative word. But bling sells, and when manufacturing costs come down, we can all look forward to this edition of Sony Style... at least so long as we're not satiated by a competing product."
It was my understanding that having games that play in insane resolution (1080p) requires not only high processing but also high storage.
Yes, but PC games have been able to do these sorts of resolutions for years and they barely fill up a single DVD. And that's with the inclusion of several sets of textures geared for different amounts of VRAM. The only way I can see them using up the space on a BluRay disc is to have a bunch of full-HD FMV. And with most games, after you watch the cutscenes once or twice, you end up skipping them every time they come up anyways. Sure, it's nice that the space is there, but I highly doubt they'll use even a fraction of it for games.
This guy's the limit!
If you can't spend 700-800 dollars on electronics then you need to get a better job.
This is a tech site, we all are overpayed pro's. If this was a site for factory workers and cleaners I could understand but not software engineers and other techies. This ain't a place for minimum wage workers.
Are you serious? I won't be getting a PS3 because I can't afford one, I would just have to save up for it. I won't be getting one because the competition is much cheaper and I can get much more bang for my buck.
That isn't even my big problem with your statement. Slashdot isn't all about overpaid engineers, many of us are not at that stage of our careers and/or are in different lines of work. One can be a geek and only make 30-40k a year. To most people 700-800 bucks is alot of money. To most slashdotters 700-800 bucks is alot of money.
Some of us are poor college CS students, some of us are people struggling to find a job out of college, some of us are at help desk jobs looking for better opportunities, and some of us are high school math teachers who enjoy what we do but aren't paid all that well. Not to mention having a good job but saving for college funds every month because you have 2 little rugrats who are going to need an education someday.
In a way I'm kinda glad Sony has gone the way they have. A year ago I thought I might end up buying 2 systems at near the same time. Now I can just be excited about spending $300 at the end of the year for a game system instead of still wondering what I am going to buy and how much it will end up costing.