Slashdot Mirror


Sony's Obsession with Proprietary Formats

geoffrobinson writes "Jonathan Last, writing for a lay audience in the Philadelphia Inquirer, comments on Sony's push for the Blu-ray format: 'Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it. One of life's more satisfying ironies, however, is that the same fate often befalls those who fixate on history... ...Obsessed with owning proprietary formats, Sony keeps picking fights. It keeps losing. And yet it keeps coming back for more, convinced that all it needs to do is push a bigger stack of chips to the center of the table.'"

32 of 491 comments (clear)

  1. Those who ignore facts are doomed to look stupid by Clockwurk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Far from being poorly supported, Blu-Ray has wide industry support (over 90 companies) and has the following companies on the Blu-Ray Disc Association board of directors.

            * Apple Computer
            * Dell
            * Hewlett Packard
            * Hitachi
            * LG Electronics
            * Mitsubishi Electric
            * Panasonic (Matsushita Electric)
            * Pioneer Corporation
            * Royal Philips Electronics
            * Samsung Electronics
            * Sharp Corporation
            * Sony Corporation
            * TDK Corporation
            * Thomson
            * Twentieth Century Fox
            * Walt Disney Pictures
            * Warner Home Video Inc.

    Of the major media houses, only Universal Pictures has pledged support for HD-DVD.

  2. How is it Any more by Nazmun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    HOw is it any more proprietary then Toshiba's HD-DVD (or whomever the designing company is)? This isn't a rhetorical question, I just don't know how.

    Both techs seem to be upgrades with associated licensing fees for the tech. Do DVD's lack any licensing fee's to whomever originally designed it?

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
    1. Re:How is it Any more by MasaMuneCyrus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because Toshiba's HD-DVD format was developed in unison with the international DVD forum, whose task it was to collaborate and create the next-gen DVDs. Sony, however, backstabbed the world, and created a second format war when it dismissed HD-DVDs and made their own specification.

      Moreover, Blu-ray has unimaginable support by movie companies, because of the very same reason everyone hates Sony and everyone hates the MPAA. The Blu-ray format has more DRM and other copy-protection than HD-DVD does.


      Simply put, BD-ROM is another propietary format developed by Sony, and it is screwing consumers in ways that this generation has never seen. The DVD forum was created to prevent another horrible VHS-Betamax war, and because of Sony's arrogance and greed, it was all for naught.

    2. Re:How is it Any more by Kenshin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because Toshiba's HD-DVD format was developed in unison with the international DVD forum [wikipedia.org], whose task it was to collaborate and create the next-gen DVDs. Sony, however, backstabbed the world, and created a second format war when it dismissed HD-DVDs and made their own specification.

      One could also say:

      Because Toshiba's HD-DVD format was developed in unison with the international DVD forum [wikipedia.org], whose task it was to collaborate and create the next-gen DVDs. Sony, however, saw that the new format wasn't advanced enough to meet standards 5 years from now, and created a second format war when it dismissed HD-DVDs and made their own specification with twice the storage capacity.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    3. Re:How is it Any more by snaz555 · · Score: 3, Informative

      A lot of the cable/satellite HD isn't really HD (1080i) but lower resolution at as low as 4-6Mbps. Same bitrate as DVD, so don't be too surprised if it doesn't look much better. By HD they usually mean "a little better than DVD", but it's not a huge difference. Often it's worse that plain old DVD. It also varies from show to show, I've found the local cable HD sports broadcasts to be pretty good, but still not HD. I don't have a set yet, because I can't see the benefit either. I just looked around to see what's out there and wasn't impressed. The only way most of us are going to get HD content is through a player, so I'm simply sitting it out until there is one established format -- at which point 1080i sets should be more common, far less expensive, and demonstrably usable to their fullest with the players and STBs.

    4. Re:How is it Any more by DA-MAN · · Score: 4, Informative

      HOw is it any more proprietary then Toshiba's HD-DVD (or whomever the designing company is)? This isn't a rhetorical question, I just don't know how.

      1) The Blu-Ray license agreement requires that no one make a combo HD-DVD/Blu-Ray player. HD has no restriction.
      2) The Blu-Ray standard allows players to be disabled when they phone home via Ethernet, should the keys of a player ever become compromised.
      3) The Blu-Ray standard will not allow one to burn their own movies. Blu-Ray DVD players check for a hologram, which if it isn't present, will not play video. Say goodbye to making backup copies or putting home movies on HD.

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    5. Re:How is it Any more by wyldeone · · Score: 4, Informative
      Moreover, Blu-ray has unimaginable support by movie companies, because of the very same reason everyone hates Sony and everyone hates the MPAA. The Blu-ray format has more DRM and other copy-protection than HD-DVD does.

      Yeah, because even though HD-DVD and Blueray use the exact same content protection system, blueray's drm is far more onerous.

      --
      In the beginning the universe was created. This made a lot of people very angry and is widely considered as a bad move.
  3. It's only a "Sony proprietary blunder..." by mehtajr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...if it loses. If Blu-ray wins, it's Sony making an absolute killing by developing the standard for hi-def DVD content. The author ignores that, and that the situation he described with Betamax is apples and oranges with Blu-ray (i.e. Sony making deals with dozens of companies to get Blu-ray drives and discs out).

  4. By name alone I have a feeling blu-ray will die by MonkeyPaw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Someone like my mother will go buy a new television - HDTV. She'll upgrade her cable box to HDTV. When it comes time to buy a new DVD player which do you think she'll pick? HD-DVD or Blu-Ray?

    Of course she'll pick the HD-DVD because it sounds like it will work with her system.

    As for the other Sony products.. I like their hardware. The Clie I have ran circles around the Palm out at the time. I HATED memorystick.

    --
    My studio - www.graylands.ca
    1. Re:By name alone I have a feeling blu-ray will die by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 5, Funny

      Someone like my mother will go buy a new television - HDTV. She'll upgrade her cable box to HDTV.

      Bet you $20 that she'll still have them hooked together with a composite cable, though.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  5. cliche retort by xusr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I bought Sony's original MiniDisc recorders for field recordings. It's a workhorse and is still performing like a champ. When I retired my Walkman (you know, the cassette kind...) after 12 or so years of continuous use, it was not for mechanical reasons.

    Ok, so mod me down. I just had to respond to a knee-jerk comment with another.

    1. Re:cliche retort by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am sure that many of Sony's flagship products are very good.. however they started slapping their name on a bunch of products that were just regular consumer items and were of poor quality, diluting their brand.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    2. Re:cliche retort by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know the pattern in your examples? They're all old Sony products. It's the newer ones people seem to be complaining about.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:cliche retort by gearfab · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Likewise, I still use my Sony D8 DAT Walkman and Sony R300 DAT Rack 11 years after purchase. With some modification, they are easily able to circumvert SCMS restrictions - which never really mattered since I bought them to tape/process Grateful Dead shows. Having said that, Sony should stick to making great versions of existing consumer products and quit trying to create/force everyone into their proprietary formats. They, quite simply, never have and never will win these battles.

    4. Re:cliche retort by shotfeel · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can't hold that against Sony. Calling it an IEEE1394 port isn't going to help anyone. Keep in mind, Sony was one of the first (the first?) to use 1394 on consumer video products (video recorders to TVs). Their brand name for their implementation of the standard was/is iLink. Apple had there own registered monicker for their implementations, called Firewire. It was only after Apple decided it would be a good idea to put the "Firewire" name in a kind of "Creative Commons" type of use to promote the standard by other industry players that it became the name for 1394.

      From there, is Sony better off changing it and confusing customers, or not changing it and confusing customers?

  6. does it really matter? by MrSquirrel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It doesn't matter to me who wins in the HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray battle. Why? Because regular DVD's look great! High definition looks better than non-HD, but not THAT much better (especially considering the costs). Sony says the ps3 will cost less than a blu-ray player... that's at $600! You can get an amazing DVD player for $150 with all the bells and whistles. When HD-DVD/Blu-Ray come to market and start to popularize, you can bet plain old DVD prices will drop. From a financial sense, DVD's trump HD-DVD and Blu-Ray DVD. ...not to mention that yargh, I'm a pirate matey, and I like to rip/burn DVD's -- something that'll be nerfed with Blu-Ray/HD-DVD.

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    1. Re:does it really matter? by timsesow · · Score: 5, Informative

      So, if you want to burn your own HD-DVDs, then you better go Blu-Ray, 'cause there aren't any HD-DVD burners coming out anytime soon. I have my first Panasonic Blu-Ray drive in my machine now, and it works great. Burns DVD-R, DVD+R, DVD-RAM, CD-/+/RW, and 25 and 50 GByte Blu-Ray disks (both -R and -RE). Plugged it into a CentOS 4.3 system (that LINUX for you Windows types) and it just worked. May be expensive ($900) right now, but that is the introductory price (read: recover engineering costs ASAP!). The real price problem right now is media, at just under $1US per gigabyte for rewritable (50GB BD-RE is $43 street, if you buy in quantity). The only HD-DVD media I can get is already recorded with a movie. Not really a computer product, just a TV product and that is sooooo 1980s!!

  7. Re:all failures - Phillips not Sony by gadlaw · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ya, Compact Disc - developed by Phillips, not Sony. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-i I heard it turned out really well.

    --
    Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
  8. Recent Attempts Probably Not Fiscally Unsuccessful by kannibal_klown · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Their proprietary formats recently have probably met the first goal of proprietary formats: feeds revenue into the company. Unfortuantely, they just keep failing to be adopted as defacto standards (for good reasons).

    Look at their memory stick. While they didn't succeed it making it the de facto standard for portable media, I'm sure it's worked great for them. Their cameras, PSP, etc all use it and between their manufacturing and licensing I'm sure it helps them out some.

    The PSP's UMD bombed for movies, that's a given, but it was a worthwhile "attempt." Personally, I think it was the price that killed it, had they made it cheaper than it would have been worth it for travelling purposes (and only travelling).

    Sure, technologically UMB is not the best for gaming because of the power/loading time associated with discs but I'm sure the licensing helps them, but it was a good effort. Storing a lot of data for personal gaming probably doesn't have too many options. Besides, if company X wants to print a game for the PSP they get a piece of the production fee one way or another.

    I have a feeling Blu Ray is where it all hits the fan. Unlike it's other more recent proprietary formats which can supplement their own products, Blu Ray can only survive on its own in the wild. It must be adopted as the main video format or else there's just little point in it. Sure if it fails you can still sell Blu Ray burners for Desktops and such, and if PS3 goes Blu Ray then publishers will need to kick a few pennies to Sony.

    But in the end, it needs to beat out HDDVD to win and the only way that could happen is if they beat it to market or offered it as a cheaper alternative. I guess we'll see what happens here.

  9. Further to your list... by AnonymousJackass · · Score: 4, Informative

    CompUSA are now offering a variety of BluRay Products for pre-order.

  10. Re:Those who ignore facts are doomed to look stupi by Duds · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most of those studios released UMD movies too.

    For a while.

  11. Technologically superior? by RSquaredW · · Score: 5, Informative

    It always seems to come up that Betamax was 'technologically superior' to VHS, and there's always some /.er who posts a refutation. Instead of being redundant, I'd argue that Minidisc was Sony's worst "technologically superior" failure. MD came about a few years before Zip, and had more storage capacity (177 MB versus 100 MB), a smaller form-factor, and the discs were cheaper. However, the software was terrible for audio (you had to record directly into the audio jack) and there was no way to use MD as portable storage until long after the iPod had arrived. There was a huge market for Zip as a middleware between floppy (1.44") and CD-R, and Sony could've aimed MD towards that market and done well (and provided a superior product to those damn Zip disks).

    Even when the first hard-disk mp3 players started coming out, Sony 'updated' with the NetMD software. That software must've been the inspiration for the rootkits of 2005, and was one of thoe most user-unfriendly products I've ever seen. Still no data-recording, even though competing players had that function, and an annoying three-copy rule on each mp3. Add this to a proprietary format and you get a terrible experience - no wonder MD never caught on. Even so, the hardware was good - the HiMD update allows .mp3 and provides hard drive functionality...but too little, too late. I would hope that Sony has learned the lesson of MD: superior technology without user-friendly software is worthless.

    --
    In accordance with E.O. 12958, this post is marked Unclassified.
  12. This isn't another betamax by Gat0r30y · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sony has a virtually guaranteed market for blu-ray disks in the PS3 gaming market. Unless the PS3 is a total failure I doubt blu-ray could be a real loser. I don't blame Sony for trying to use that market to push HD-DVD out of the market.

    --
    Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
  13. Re:Those who ignore facts are doomed to look stupi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think that assuming the upcoming format battle is limited to Blu-Ray and HD-DVD is too simplistic. I would add to the mix: existing DVD and the anti-format: movies via the internet. Exisiting DVD still looks quite strong since the quality improvements gained from DVD to Blu-Ray/HD-DVD arn't nearly as compelling as the gains when moving from VHS to DVD. Movies via the internet is more paletable every day with data rates improving and the cost of storage decreasing.

    To me, it looks like a four horse race with DVD leading on the inside lane, Internet gaining ground on everyone else and HD-DVD and Blu-Ray weighed down by Big Media interested and lacking the speed to overtake DVD or outrun unfettered internet access.

  14. Re:Those who ignore facts are doomed to look stupi by Kenshin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    UMD can only be played on the PSP, and only on the PSP's display.

    Blu-ray Discs can be played on any BD player (when they're shortly available), and on any display. (With varying resolutions.)

    Any attempt to compare the two is either misinformed or biased.

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  15. Re:Those who ignore facts are doomed to look stupi by deltagreen · · Score: 4, Informative

    You make it sound like Sony was the only company backing their technology in the past, and that was the reason they failed.

    As well as Sony and Sanyo, Betamax video recorders were also sold by Toshiba, Pioneer, Aiwa and NEC. The Zenith Electronics Corporation and WEGA Corporations contracted with Sony to produce VCRs for their product lines. Department Stores like Sears in the US and Quelle in Germany sold Beta format VCRs under their house brands as did the Radio Shack chain of electronic stores.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betamax

    The HD DVD Promotion Group also has a rather long list of members, among them:

    • Broadcom Corporation
    • CANON INC.
    • FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
    • Fujitsu Limited.
    • Hewlett-Packard Company
    • Hitachi Maxell, Ltd.
    • Imation Corp
    • Intel Corporation
    • Kenwood Corporation
    • Konica Minolta Opto, Inc.
    • Lenovo Japan
    • Microsoft Corporation
    • Mitsubishi Kagaku Media Co., Ltd. / Verbatim
    • NEC Electronics Corporation
    • Paramount Home Entertainment
    • RICOH COMPANY LTD.
    • SANYO Electric Co., Ltd.
    • TEAC CORPORATION
    • TOSHIBA CORPORATION
    • Ulead Systems, Inc.
    • Universal Pictures
    • Warner Home Video Inc.
    http://www.hddvdprg.com/about/member.html

    If Universal Pictures is the only media house supporting HD-DVD, it does seem a bit strange that Warner Home Video Inc. and Paramount Home Entertainment are also members of a group promoting HD-DVD...

  16. Re:Why I avoid by erroneus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many Japanese people agree with you... and so do I.

    Sony used to be 'the' thing to get but for the past... I don't know, 8-10 years maybe, they've really seemed to have their heads up their asses. They are NOT Apple though they seem to think they are. What I mean by this is that in Apple's case, whatever they make is gold every time they slap their Apple logo onto anything. This is not so with Sony. There are too many competitors and Sony is not a culture all its own as Apple is at the moment.

    My bad experiences with Sony started when I was selecting a laptop. I wanted to run a Japanese OS and expected that since Sony was a Japanese company, that I wouldn't have any trouble getting support. Boy was I EVER wrong on that. I should have gotten an IBM! It ha(d) WAY better Japanese language support than any other at the time. Pretty amazing considering it was an American company.

    And from that point forward, my bad experiences with their stuff just kept piling up. I've been 'done' with Sony since about 5 years ago. Now I just wait for them to die.

  17. Same as with audio by drdanny_orig · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It's interesting that the history of SonicStage, the software Sony distributes with their consumer Walkman-type stuff (minidisc, "mp3" players, etc) is similar. The "preferred" format is ATRAC (.omg/.oma) a proprietary one that no other software supports. When MP3 was finally added, it was not truly MP3 -- rather it required you to process MP3 files through their software which SONY-ized it to a more propietary form of MP3. Today, when you plug a Bean player (Sony's previous generation iPod competitor) to a USB port, it's recognized as an external disc drive, but you cannot just drag-n-drop MP3 files (or even .omg files) to it and expect them to play: Sony insists on getting their hands into your audio data.


    Original versions of Sony's minidisc platform wouldn't allow you to digitally upload material you had recorded. You had to route the audio outout and use an analog process to get the stuff to your PC. When customers complained, they responded by providing the upload capability, but you only had one shot at it: the recording was then marked uncopyable!!! Finally, they currently support unlimited uploading, but I suspect it has other odious restrictions.


    If I didn't have so much invested in Sony hardware, I'd drop them like a rock.

    --
    .nosig
  18. CD's Successors by Comboman · · Score: 4, Funny
    No kidding. I'd say their biggest failure by far was that horrible compact disc experiment. What ever happened to that, anyways?

    It was made obsolete by Sony's other great experiments like Digital Audio Tape (DAT), MiniDisc (MD), Super Audio CD (SACD) and of course RootKit Enabled CD (RECD).

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  19. I've got good news and bad news.. by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 3, Funny

    To: Howard Stringer, CEO, Sony Corporation

    From: Djinns'R'Us, Wish Granting Department

    Re: Recent requests after bottle opening

    Dear Mr. Stringer,

    We are pleased to announce that we have fulfilled your latest request: to make Sony "the next Apple". Although we had to steal resources from projects in our Monkey's Paw Department, we have managed to complete this task up to your specifications.

    We hope you enjoy the restructuring. Sony now resembles Apple, circa 1996.

    Sincerely,

    --
    --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
  20. Re:Those who ignore facts are doomed to look stupi by transami · · Score: 5, Insightful

    UMD could have been successful, if Sony "opened" it up more. I think that's the heart of the matter. It's not that they have propretary formats. It''s just that they cling to them too tightly.

    I would have been very interested in a UMD drive form my computer. Small, well protected. Burn my own PSP media. Very cool. It woud And a blu-ray based UMD disc later on (for PSP2) would have been the bomb. And if I could plug my PSP into my TV and watch the UMD like that would be very cool too. I actually wish Sony would retry with UMD, but this time do it right.

    T.

    --
    :T:R:A:N:S:
  21. Re:Regular DVDs do not look "great" by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... and it frustrates me because they are screwing up something we really need.

    Sure, sure, higher resolution video entertainment is a pleasant luxury item, but it boggles the mind to see it described as "something we really need".

    I mean, solutions to problems of social injustice, environmental degradation, resource exhaustion, those are things we really need. Prettier ways to watch movies in our livingrooms are nice, and something I'll certainly be spending money on when their available and affordable, but hardly a necessity.