Windows Servers Beat Linux Servers
RobbeR49 writes "Windows Server 2003 was recently compared against Linux and Unix variants in a survey by the Yankee Group, with Windows having a higher annual uptime than Linux. Unix was the big winner, however, beating both Windows and Linux in annual uptime. From the article: 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux, and Linux distributions from "niche" open source vendors, are offline more and longer than either Windows or Unix competitors, the survey said. The reason: the scarcity of Linux and open source documentation.' Yankee Group is claiming no bias in the survey as they were not sponsored by any particular OS vendor."
Our Windows 2003 TS servers have a much longer uptime than our Linux servers that are accessed from our lab. Simply because fewer people choose to use the Windows service....
Ah, now we get to the heart of the matter. Obviously Microsoft has managed to pull ahead by padding the output of the uptime command: 20% more characters means 20% more uptime!
Craft Beer Programming T-shirts
If you have a Win2K3 server and a Linux server side by side and they've been running for 120 hours as measured by an independent timepiece,
Linux uptime would report
Windows uptime would report
if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.