VMWare Eats Microsoft's Lunch
feminazi writes "Jeff Boles attributes VMWare's dominance over Microsoft in the virtualization market to a combination of product depth and focus, but especially to the fact that 'VMWare is actually delivering Microsoft's product in the way that Microsoft should be delivering it.' The ease of GUI but with those enterprise-ready traits that Microsoft is still struggling with: application separation, and decent resource utilization."
And MSN search vomits chairs at Google search.
Oh, I get it. So what we really want from the Microsoft OS is Ubuntu.
or, rather RHEL.
Is this phrase really in common usage?
Yes.
It doesn't make any sense.
Sure it does. Just because you aren't clued in to the idiomatic meaning doesn't mean it's ready to buy the farm. Not that it's a black and white issue, mind you, but frankly I could care less.
Keep it on the black part, dude.
KFG
Just wanted to say that I was giddy with glee to find that this article was tagged 'lunch'
there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
Don't forget Windows, too...
Well, VMWare is eating Microsoft's lunch (via VirtualPC), but it's then passing on some of the nutrients. Kinda.
I'd better stop pursuing that analogy, there's a bad mental image coming up.
USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)