Slashdot Mirror


NASA Clears Shuttle Fuel Tank for Flight

Screamer49 writes "CNN is reporting that NASA approved a major design change in the space shuttle's fuel tank on Wednesday, clearing the last major hurdle before shuttle flights can resume as early as July 1." It's nice to have a more functional space program again, isn't it?

7 of 156 comments (clear)

  1. A whole year? by NPN_Transistor · · Score: 3, Funny

    So it took an entire year to decide whether or not to attach a little piece of foam to the space shuttle? Even the development of Windows Vista is going faster than this!

    1. Re:A whole year? by Slithe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hell, even the development of Duke Nukem: Forever is going faster than this!

      --
      ---- "XML is like violence. If it doesn't fix the problem, you aren't using enough."
  2. Re:Improvements by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Better colors?"

    Now that you mention it...

    NASA's PR department has done extensive research over the last 3 quarters and discovered that their audience is strangely disproportionately skewed towards males. In an effort to interest young girls in NASA, the external tank will be repainted in "OMG! Ponies!" pink. There are also plans to take a pony up to ISS. :^)

  3. Re:You tell me. by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's more functional when the Shuttle tank clears the launch tower.

  4. Only half the story! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Funny

    The summary only mentioned half the story. The tank has been upgraded too. Besides the sensor changes, NASA estimates this tank to be just under a megaton, a substantial improvement in power from the previous airbursts.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  5. Headline by ms1234 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Am I the only one seeing the headline and thinking: Why did they empty it before launch?

  6. Chicken != Hatched by Duds · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's nice to have a more functional space program again, isn't it?

    Might want to wait to make that assertion :)