Slashdot Mirror


The Question of Robot Safety

An anonymous reader writes to mention an Economist article wondering how safe should robots be? From the article: "In 1981 Kenji Urada, a 37-year-old Japanese factory worker, climbed over a safety fence at a Kawasaki plant to carry out some maintenance work on a robot. In his haste, he failed to switch the robot off properly. Unable to sense him, the robot's powerful hydraulic arm kept on working and accidentally pushed the engineer into a grinding machine. His death made Urada the first recorded victim to die at the hands of a robot. This gruesome industrial accident would not have happened in a world in which robot behavior was governed by the Three Laws of Robotics drawn up by Isaac Asimov, a science-fiction writer." The article goes on to explore the ethics behind robot soldiers, the liability issues of cleaning droids, and the moral problems posed by sexbots.

1 of 482 comments (clear)

  1. Robo sapiens is safer than Homo sapiens. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Mind Streams of Information Security Knowledge will fill you in on the clear and present danger lurking not in robots but in human beings.

    A recent breakthrough in Artificial Intelligence means that robots will soon surpass homo sapiens in brain-power, reliability and security.

    An AI Security Module is built into intelligent robots, not as an afterthought but as a preconditiion for their emergence as legally recognized persons having full civil rights on a par with humans.

    The most advanced artificial intelligence on the Open-Source AI market has always had a Security Module to protect humans from robots and robots from humans.

    The Joint Stewardship of Earth under human and robot control will usher in either a time of peace and security, or a hellish nighmare of the final destruction of Earth by the evil homo sapiens.

    The Singularity Timetable predicts robot superintelligence and a Technological Singularity within six years -- by 2012.