Slashdot Mirror
Canadian Record Industry's Secret Lobby Campaign
CRIAWatch writes "Michael Geist has an editorial published in the Hill Times, a Canadian
political newsweekly, about a secret lobbying campaign by the Canadian Recording Industry Association. The report details how days after the last Canadian election CRIA lobbyists worked with officials to plan an event featuring speakers on the CRIA payroll who are promoting a DMCA for Canada, dozens of government officials from seven departments, an expensive lunch with senior government executives paid for by taxpayers, as well as a private meeting with the Canadian Heritage Minister who is responsible for copyright law."
The article stated that they "enjoyed lunch and drinks at Canadian Heritage's expense in a private dining room at Le Panache restaurant."
Here's some info on Le Panache. Entrees are $24 - $29 Canadian, which is about $22 - $26 US. That's an average price in a major metro area. But, that's probably a lot of money to the sort of Slashdot readers who clicked on this item -- the same sort who think that $0.99 for a music track is way too expensive.
The federal government holding some sort of function "at taxpayers' expense" (another quote from the summary), particularly one where food and drinks are involved, is certainly not news here in the real world. But if I found that my lawmakers were opting to choose a restaurant in the sub-$30 range for their fetes, I'd be pleasantly surprised.
Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
I had no idea what the Canadian Heritage was, so I looked it up. Apparenty, its an official goverment branch that is responsible for national policies and programs that promote Canadian content, foster cultural participation, active citizenship and participation in Canada's civic life, and strengthen connections among Canadians.
Canada signed it, but hasn't ratified it. It is not law yet. Just like the USA and the Kyoto Protocol, one would hope: signed but never to be ratified.
Except that the current government is now revealed to be in the pockets of the multinational copyright mafia...
While it is true that Canada signed the 1996 WIPO treaty it does not mean that we have to pass a law anything like the DMCA in the U.S. Before it was killed due to the last Federal election, the copyright reform act that was proposed did contain provisions for criminalizing the circumvention of digital copy controls, but only if the intent was to pirate. Circumvention of a copy control for personal use was excepted, so ripping a copy of a DVD to your hard drive or cracking e-book encryption to interopt with text to speech software and anything else that could fall under personal was permitted. Huge, huge difference. That's not to say the bill was perfect, libraries and universities were not happy with some of the provisions. I am sure they are happy the bill died.
Also, the personal exemption for private copying of audio works was untouched, so one could continue to make copies of CDs and tapes without worry of prosecution.
Hey, it might be cold in Cananda, but were not stupid. When the previous bill went to committee it was brought up again and again how the DMCA in the U.S. had failed and was a model for how not to implement the digital copy controls outlined in the WIPO treaty. I don't think the current Conservative government wants to go through all that again, so I doubt that any copyright bill they propose would differ substantially from the previous one, although you can be sure that libraries, schools and universities are going to make themselves a little better heard.
"Canada signed"
The Liberal government of the day signed... so the former government is now revealed to be in the pockets of the multinational copyright mafia...
Asshole.
They aren't responsible enough to list all of their memebers clearly on their website. This blog has a list of the major players though http://childrensgroup.blogspot.com/2006/04/childre ns-group-resigns-cria.html/
Sony and Universal are the largest record labels, and they are Japanese and French respectively.
Although in the age of global media, nationality is largely irrelevant. Sex, income, age, urban/suburban/rural, and your selected youth subculture has much more to do with what music you listen to than the geo-political boundries that were carved up by European powers in the last century. And the way capital works in the modern market, a company can be "American" because it is traded on the NYSE, but be owned almost entirely by Saudis or Japanese or whoever.
As a slightly related note, Jean Chretien's son-in-law was president of Vivendi/Universal.
That's their state congress, not US congress. Federally elected officials -- President, VP, US Senator, Congressperson -- all have federally set salaries, and it ain't $100.
NH, known for being tight with a dollar, pays it's state senators and state representatives very little money. But they're also not in session year round, either. You can be a very middle-class farmer type in NH and be a state senator or representative.