Slashdot Mirror


Basic Internal Instant Messaging Solution?

sk8dork asks: "I am pretty much _the_ internal IT person at the company I work for and I am recognizing the need for internal Instant Messaging more and more each day. While email is quick and easy to send, it's not always the quickest way to get your message to someone when they're not monitoring their inbox every second of the day. Having come from a position in Dell tech support I've experienced the MS communications solution but was put off by the instability of it and, now that I've looked into purchasing it, the steep price as well. For more stability we often used an internal IRC channel, but most people would either not login or they'd just be put off by its complexity. In this new company, where close to no one is 'computer savvy', I am in need of an Instant Messaging solution that is easy to use, secure, limited to our network, and inexpensive. I'd like to stay away from the mainstream IM clients such as Yahoo!, AIM, ICQ and others. We're running Windows Server 2003 for Small Business (sorry) and will be soon upgrading out of the SBE to regular Windows Server 2003. Any helpful information will be greatly appreciated."

12 of 155 comments (clear)

  1. Open Source by packetmon · · Score: 5, Informative

    Jabber along with Exodus works wonders. When I worked at a small/mid sized (200 employees) business I configured this across the board along via VPN. It was secure, fast, stable and as good as any IM client and server I've come across. I configure employees into groups in accordance with their office (e.g. NY, Miami, Mass, etc.). Workers were able to transfer files when necessary, vent gripes without worrying about snooping, etc.

    1. Re:Open Source by gi-tux · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or pickup the software from JiveSoftware. They have a client and server. The server can even tie into you Active Directory Domain if I remember correctly. I used an earlier version of their server with both Exodus and Gaim (before they had their own client).

      --
      I have no sig, does anyone have one to spare?
  2. Jiveserver by s0abas · · Score: 5, Informative

    We use JiveServer (Wildfire) and the associated spark client.

    It uses the jabber protocol and as such, can be used with a variety of IM clients.

    1. Re:Jiveserver by #undefined · · Score: 3, Informative

      let me second jive software's wildfire jabber server.

      it's java so it runs anywhere. i'm currently running it as a service on a windows 2000 workstation.

      the web admin interface is nice.

      i'm running the old version (jive messenger) as the newer plugins and expanded database support haven't been reason enough to upgrade and i don't consider security a big enough issue on an intranet. don't let my downplaying of the new plugins discourage you, but instead it should speak highly of how well the basic server fulfills communication needs (instant messaging & chat rooms).

      my only other suggestion would be to use psi as the client. it's cross-platform (windows, macosx, linux), coded with qt, so that should easy your it support if there's multiple platforms. of course spark is cross-platform too, being java, but i don't have any experience having found psi sufficient for ~4 years.

    2. Re:Jiveserver by gbobeck · · Score: 3, Informative

      I would also recommend Wildfire (formerly Jive).

      I set up a Wildfire server at Loyola University Chicago, and it was exceptionally easy and secure. Since we use LDAP authentication in our computer science, we were able to instantly have user accounts pre-loaded. For Windows users, Wildfire should integrate with active directory very easily.

      I would also recommend using Spark or Gaim as a jabber client.

      Of course, the Spark admin plug-in for Wildfire is a good addition, as it provides a localized download area for the Spark Client and it helps to keep users up to date with the client.

      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  3. Jabber by Colin+Smith · · Score: 5, Informative

    I mean, honestly.

    http://www.jabber.org/software/servers.shtml

    Yes, you can get a server for a Windows platform, yes you can pay for it too if it helps.

    --
    Deleted
  4. The old-fashioned solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I use this novel instant communication technique called talking.

    See I get up, or just raise my voice (depending on the situation) and talk to the person I want to have an instant communication with. It is pretty easy to have one-to-many instant messages, too.

    It is nice in that this instant messaging technique continues to work even if the server or network goes down.

    One the down side, it only works for short distances, but you can get the phone plug-in for longer distances. But with the phone plug-in it is tough to see if the person you want to send an instant message to is "on-line".

    The other downside is you can't change your avatar (aka buddy icon), and I don't like the way mine looks. Some people try to hack this sometimes (Halloween for example) but it rarely looks right. You can get your avatar professional altered but that cost a lot of money.

  5. ICQ Groupware by bstrunk · · Score: 3, Informative

    ICQ offers a groupware product, designed to be used on internal networks only. Best of all, its freeware. http://www.networkingfiles.com/Communications/Icqg roupware.htm

    --
    --BSOBN--
  6. We use that all the time at my office by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    File transfers are a bit slow though. Also, outsiders tend to get confused when I stand up and say: "Hey Mike, here's that file you wanted. 10101011101011010100010101010011010101010110101010 01010010101010101010101010010101110101010101101010 10101100101101010100101101011101010101101101001010 10101010010001010100101001010010100101011010101010 10100101111101010101110101010010101000001010101000 00101010010101000101010000000000000001101111111111 11010101010000000110010101010100101010010101001010 10010101010010101010010101010010101011010101010101 010010101".

  7. Omnipod might be an option by vallee · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hey,

    Here at Pythian Remote DBA we've had a client these past two years called Omnipod. They run a good shop and the tech guys there are absolute tops.

    Their software is a turnkey hosted secure instant messaging platform. It integrates with the big three networks just fine. It has amazing archiving and audit abilities, thus its popularity in the financial sector (those dudes have to keep all written communication for a few years or they're not allowed to use it at all).

    Furthermore, it has an extremely cool feature that's not in any of Y! AIM or MSN: You can create Venn-diagram like overlap groups so that line workers can't just IM the CEO, and so that you can control the communication of presence information inside and outside the group.

    It's all very cool and I can recommend it without hesitating. Although it's not FOS, the fact that you don't have to administer it and that you can be up and running tomorrow totally kicks ass.

    HTH

    Paul

    --
    The real Paul Vallee is slashdot userid 2192, and, what do you mean it's not cool to point out your low userid?
  8. Re:SSL is enough by GiMP · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is substantial benefit for the higher-ups to have end-to-end encryption. With an end-to-end encryption, the parties at both ends can discuss things like terminating the systems administrator or confidential information that may affect stock prices. With SSL, the systems administrator(s) can snoop.

  9. If your users won't use it, do you truly need it? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Insightful


    You said when you had an internal IRC channel set up, your users would avoid logging into it and were turned off by its complexity.

    Regardless of what Instant Messaging solution you eventually decide on, will the situation be any different? If your users don't see the value of IM, it will be hard to convince them to make use of it, no matter how secure, convenient, or simple it is.