Labs Compete to Build New Nuclear Bomb
An anonymous reader writes "Yahoo! News is reporting that two labs are currently competing to design the first new nuclear bomb in twenty years. The new bomb was approved as a part of the 2006 defense spending bill. From the article: 'Proponents of the project say the U.S. would lose its so-called "strategic deterrent" unless it replaces its aging arsenal of about 6,000 bombs, which will become potentially unreliable within 15 years. A new, more reliable weapon, they say, would help the nation reduce its stockpile.'"
Yeeehaw!
nothing.can.stop.me.now
If there were a greater investment in grammar checking programs, the article's headline would be readable.
My other sig is extremely clever...
Pfftt, please! Such old technology. Shouldn't we be building anti-matter bombs these days?
Life is not for the lazy.
I think they meant, "Labs Compete to Built New Nuke-u-ler Bomb."
The US is confirmed to be producing weapons of mass destruction.
Who's up for 'liberating' them?
"Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
The design is so advanced it suspends causality.
Why doesn't the US just buy some new designs from South Africa, Israel, India or Pakistan?
Oh well, what the hell...
hey, let's outsource this project...
xD
Did you know that "FTW" ("for the win") is a direct translation of "Sieg Heil"?