Labs Compete to Build New Nuclear Bomb
An anonymous reader writes "Yahoo! News is reporting that two labs are currently competing to design the first new nuclear bomb in twenty years. The new bomb was approved as a part of the 2006 defense spending bill. From the article: 'Proponents of the project say the U.S. would lose its so-called "strategic deterrent" unless it replaces its aging arsenal of about 6,000 bombs, which will become potentially unreliable within 15 years. A new, more reliable weapon, they say, would help the nation reduce its stockpile.'"
Yeeehaw!
nothing.can.stop.me.now
If there were a greater investment in grammar checking programs, the article's headline would be readable.
My other sig is extremely clever...
I think they meant, "Labs Compete to Built New Nuke-u-ler Bomb."
Antimatter is so old fashioned. Bring on the singularity weapons and matter-energy conversion beams, I say!
Actually, can you imagine what a pain in the ass antimatter weapons would be? One power failure, and BOOM - say goodbye to your stockpile, and most of the continent you were storing it on.
Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
Hey, you're not supporting the troops. It's ok for the US to do it, because the US would never use a weapon of mass destruction like a nuke against a civilian population.
The design is so advanced it suspends causality.
Why doesn't the US just buy some new designs from South Africa, Israel, India or Pakistan?
Oh well, what the hell...
Who's up for 'liberating' them?
No no no, we only need to liberate countries that are run by mad men. You know the type that torture people, spy on their citizens, and violate international law.
hey, let's outsource this project...
xD
Did you know that "FTW" ("for the win") is a direct translation of "Sieg Heil"?